>>410192This post glows. Yes, small internet sites produce bad things but they also produce good things.
so, counter point: large websites are controlled by major corporations that censor on behest of the government, intelligence agencies, and industrial interests. Smaller websites are maintained as hobbies by a single person or small group of people are usually can fly under the radar or are not subject to the same advertiser-driven approval, ex: youtube video demonitization/deranking of "controversial" topics like war, even if they are newsworthy. They just want a constant stream of anodyne soylent tier content to slap advertisements on.
Also your last point is wrong, youtube had a well known "radicalization" right wing pipeline, there is nothing about the size of mainstream social media that prevents recommender algorithm driven echo chambers, maybe its even more radical on yt/facebook because the algorithmic timelines are far more sophisticated than anything a small site could ever hope to achieve.