>>412765>>412776Where was I defending the labor party or claiming they were anything other than neolibs? I said pretty clearly that I'm going to waste my vote. If I did live in a marginal urban seat I'd probably prefer them, yes, although that is not out of sympathy of respect for them but for three reasons, one being their policy on China is less suicidal, two their pandemic response will likely be more competent and the final reason being their policy on the environment and particularly the Murray darling basin is better than outright CIA backed mafia rule which currently poses a near existential threat.
>So it doesn't convince me when you say 'white nationalism is good actually, because laborites in 1890 were white nationalists'Never said this or anything remotely similar. You're just making stuff up.
>And to reduce all the history of the different socialist and left-wing movements into just the large unions and the labor party is an insult to the actual communists and socialists that existed in those times.Where did I do this? Can you show me where I supposedly claimed that the labor party ever represented socialism?
>Also, recognising the adverse affects of immigration on wages etc does not have anything to do with being nationalist or 'pro-white'.Nationalism =/= White nationalism and is in fact an antithesis of it in Australia. If we seriously want to combat white nationalism we need to construct a strong national identity separated from race, distinct from & not linked to angloism or Yankee-worship. I've been pretty clear about this in other threads, so again you're just making shit up for god knows what reason.
tl;dr -
You're either a troll or some dishonest drama-seeking retard. Either self-criticize & suck my Hwasong in repentance or deport yourself to Yankeestan so a human being with a functional brain can take your place.
Edit: Repost because relevant response pic