[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/b/ - Siberia

"We need an imageboard of action to fight for OC making posters."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1627525871904.png ( 173.29 KB , 300x300 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.117962[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

285 posts and 31 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.120244

>>120221
The point is that he/she/they often uses moral argumentation of the type of "X is true because if you believe otherwise youre bad person" (usually in threads about gender). My post refers to the fact that morality isnt absolute, it is 100% artificially constructed by the currently existing system, and is thus irrelevant to other systems such as the one that we seek to replace the current with. And thus that kind of argumentation based on liberal morality, often used by that anon, is entirely worthless. This is spread out through M&E's writings on topics of historical materialism, which is why i referenced it.

Everything i just wrote was already said or clearly implied in the post you replied to.
The fact that you didnt understand that, nor do you understand the relationship to Marx and Engels, is very telling. Consider going back where you came from.

I didnt quote because this is so basic and so spread out throughout marxist work that it amazed me you unironically demand it. Well here you go, an example out of many possible (Anti-Duhring):
>If it were such an easy business there would certainly be no dispute at all over good and evil; everyone would know what was good and what was bad. But how do things stand today? What morality is preached to us today? There is first Christian-feudal morality, inherited from earlier religious times; and this is divided, essentially, into a Catholic and a Protestant morality, each of which has no lack of subdivisions, from the Jesuit-Catholic and Orthodox-Protestant to loose “enlightened” moralities. Alongside these we find the modern-bourgeois morality and beside it also the proletarian morality of the future, so that in the most advanced European countries alone the past, present and future provide three great groups of moral theories which are in force simultaneously and alongside each other. Which, then, is the true one?
(…)
>But nevertheless there is great deal which the three moral theories mentioned above have in common — is this not at least a portion of a morality which is fixed once and for all? — These moral theories represent three different stages of the same historical development, have therefore a common historical background, and for that reason alone they necessarily have much in common. Even more. At similar or appPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.120264

>>120244
>Everything i just wrote was already said or clearly implied in the post you replied to.
No, it wasn't.
Before, you only said
>you're bad because you have morality of a liberal
That's completely different from
>all morality is 100% subjective

>I didnt quote

I don't mean quote, I mean just explaining what you mean.
Telling someone to "read book x" is something that only pseuds do. It's equivalent to saying
>you're wrong and I'm right and you're stupid and this book proves me right
Philosophy is not biochemistry, you don't need to know tons of specific facts to get it. Vast majority of what is needed is just understanding of language and "general cultural knowledge".
Referring someone to a large book as an argument is brainlet elitism, just like quotes are an argument to authority.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.120279

>>120244
>In case you care, I'm for abolishing concept of gender, as gender roles and gender identity in the first place were created by old societies for division of labour and therefore will be obsolete. Anon is against because (anon believes) gender categorization is real and its mean and intolerant to trans people who self-identify through these gender identities (MtF etc).
This take has existed since 2014 and has aged like milk, while (obviously) the ideal is for the abolition of gender roles its real fucking easy to say that when you are a cis white man who enjoys all the benefits of it. The transgender fams (many of who philosophically support the same gender abolition no less) are actually involved in the direct expansion of those genders and therefore defining a framework (and not an ideal magic wand saying gender be gone!) where gender roles can be abolished. This is of course all quaint to the nearby future where body-hacking will necessarily sweep all sex distinction (and with it most reactive gender discourse) under the table - which retroactively defines 'gender critical' as a reactionary ideology.

Being 'but there should be no genders' is literally no different than the utopian socialism Engels railed against, things are a process and transgenders are a pretty obvious instance of this zeitgeist. Also its fucking cowardly because again youre a cis man who can do nothing but enjoy most of the gender roles that you inherited.

I actually hate talking about this stuff but the trans takes in this board are so fucking bad, that me a cis man with literally no understanding of Butler, find entirely laughable.
>>

 No.121060

>>120214
seethe and cope
>>

 No.121061

>>120244
>otherwise youre bad person
wow nice strawman. I guess commies and libs are exactly the same after all


 No.121040[Reply]

new Magariño up in 25 min.


File: 1621080852433.jpg ( 322.35 KB , 1225x2048 , 1577072837398.jpg )

 No.44992[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Post attractive persons wearing glasses in this thread.
212 posts and 129 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.112638

>>112547
Fuck, I love this photo

>>62439
IDK what the relationship between those people is, but that's from a Games Done Quick event. Those are known as huge sources of cringe because they're events where a lot of awkward nerds gather IRL to play and beat video games really fast in front of a live audience. So their embarrassing antics are often caught on camera.
>>

 No.112641

>>44992
Looks like my grandma but young
I miss you grandma
>>

 No.112646

>>112641
Awww :(
>>

 No.114949

>>

 No.121035

The protag of Phantasmagoria 2


File: 1627738680903.jpg ( 19.27 KB , 480x360 , haz.jpg )

 No.120393[Reply]

23 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.120956

File: 1627760215736.png ( 852.85 KB , 1005x1311 , 1625008287995.png )

>>I'm too retarded for this shit ;_;
>>

 No.120962

File: 1627760710524.jpg ( 146.77 KB , 1280x720 , gigatist.jpg )

>>120956
>>>I'm too retarded for this shit ;_;
>>

 No.121024

File: 1627766229606.png ( 35.13 KB , 1080x1246 , gigasoychad.png )

>>120962
>>>>I'm too retarded for this shit ;_;
>>

 No.121030

>>120940
>>120942
>>120945
>>120948
>>120951
>>120952
>>120954
I actually feel bad, here anon just put the link in the embed space, below file and above password
>>

 No.121031

>>121030
I never noticed there was an embed space before


File: 1627762078440.jpg ( 179.04 KB , 1280x1211 , 1627762063946.jpg )

 No.120986[Reply]

Which one are you?
5 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.121004

I'm a COMMUNIST with a capital C, and you're all CUCKS with capital C, U, C, K. AND S
>>

 No.121009

I am the principled Maoists happily cleaning up panda enclosures in post-Revolutionary China.
>>

 No.121011

I wanna fuck puyi in his bussy
>>

 No.121019

>>121000
His wife remained loyal to the left and was pissed at his fascist opportunism. Fucking grifter Angloid broke her heart.
>>

 No.121025

>>121000
did you mean architect?


File: 1626446406727.png ( 251.31 KB , 774x598 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.105581[Reply]

JANNY BULLYING GENERAL 2

Remember under communism you will still do it for free
42 posts and 14 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.118128

>>

 No.118150

File: 1627556376215.jpg ( 47.89 KB , 369x365 , 4 1=JANNY.jpg )

Critical support for volunteers.
>>

 No.121006

>Okay, I agree we've been letting things slip a bit, unfortunately there's quite a bit of disagreement in the mod team about what and how to moderate. But we will try to sort it out and do better.
NEW SPLIT JUST DROPPED
>>

 No.121015

>>121006
proof?
>>

 No.121214

File: 1627775813325.png ( 114.27 KB , 474x387 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>121006
If the mods are going to ban anyone, I request it be dramafags. Worse than jannies, avatarfags and soyjakers combined.


File: 1627764966125.png ( 106.93 KB , 1080x1133 , Screenshot_20210731-165404….png )

 No.121193[Reply]

Bros we were supposed to be a global super power by now. We were supposed to have the world bowing down to us at our mercy.

How are we losing so badly????
11 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.121205

Tbf the Olympics is mostly determined by how much you fund your doping program. Which India has wisely decided not to invest in.
>>

 No.121206

>>121204
https://youtu.be/-81BSn9qPXA

This is the type of person bitching about Olympics. Don't pay attention to them
>>

 No.121207

>>121205
Oh yeah man Kenya is good at long distance running cause all that funding!

Lol
>>

 No.121208

What has this to do with leftism or even politics?
>>

 No.121209

Indians don't prioritize sports in k-12 education so they end up being shit at sports. Indias government doesn't prioritize Olympic wins either like how China or the US does

If there was a Olympic sport for cricket, then Indians would do well.


File: 1627598771775.png ( 324.86 KB , 821x866 , Trans Noumena.png )

 No.118772[Reply]

Since /b/ is now actually /tttt/ I'm giving in just to spite you faggots. Most of you suck at this shit and if you're going to make a trans thread you might as well put some fucking effort into the OP. I genuinely hope that the next trans thread (and you know that there will be more) has more brain cells than it has posts. Also I just really want someone to respond to me, I wasn't given enough attention as a child sorry. So please, take some time to read and/or tear apart my blog post.

Gender and sex are seperate concepts despite the material origins of the latter.
Gender only materially exists insofar as the sexes can be assigned certain roles for their physiological ability in relationship to the needs of their society. A male is strong and hunts or does difficult labour, but most people don't hunt anymore and difficult labour is becoming obsolete. The more vulnerable female needs protection and focuses on birthing and raising her offspring, but that vulnerability shrinks in severity as daily life becomes safer, and her duties become obsolete along with it. The material origins of gender will be abolished when the need for physiological differences between men and women are overcome, and from there it's just a matter of ideology.
Why is gender seperate from sex? The reason why I say "gender" and not "sex roles" is because such "sex roles" would have to be fluid and open to modification. If a large percentage men in given a society are absent or dead, the remaining women have to take up their roles, and vice-versa (within reason). There is plenty of evidence for this throughout human history, but I must repeat once again that such roles are slowly becoming subverted as such socially necessary physiological differences are being rendered obsolete by technological advancement.
In the far future, assuming that our mastery of biology allows us to alter our forms in novel ways, the same will happen to sex and even our to our definition of humanity. But let's put that aside for now.

The conflation of gender and sex confounds our method of dealing with trans identity politics.
I refuse to refer to all trans people as transgender. Why? Simply put, there are some cases of trans people for whom sex reassignment surgery benefits them, and likewise there are some for whom it harms them. I will differentiate from these two categories by using the tePost too long. Click here to view the full text.
26 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.119085

>>119057
>free daycare and birth control
This is somewhat contradictory.
Birth control would reduce the prevalence of reproduction by proxy, but this conflict with occasions where reducing birthrates is undesirable.
Although free daycare would lessen the need for a caretaker role, such is also a reduction in the costs of living and will increase the likelihood that parents will have more children. This also means that sufficiently advanced socialist planning will have the same effect on birthrates.
Both should still be provided of course, but neither are much in terms of solutions to the problem at hand.
>ideally it would be both with free healthcare and robots for all
Agreed, but don't forget artificial wombs. Gender aside, it's pretty obvious but pregnancy is a significant encumbrance on the freedom of females.
>>

 No.120968

bump
>>

 No.120980

The only solution is killing and eating our rulers and furious orgies with the transhumanists on their bodies
>>

 No.120999

File: 1627763441376.jpg ( 97.03 KB , 640x640 , 1627527135161.jpg )

Gender is not real
trans"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""genders""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" are inforcers of the gender binary myth that perpetuate the reactionary concept of women by trying to become a strawman stereotype of one
>>

 No.121003

>>120999
Transgenders are just as valid as cisgenders (not valid). Gender isn't real but the social construct will take time before being abolished, hence gender accelerationism is the best path forward.


File: 1627264875957.jpg ( 212.58 KB , 901x1280 , soviet-anti-religious-prop….jpg )

 No.114762[Reply]

He did look like this and he did do this
3 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.114844

>>114836
>make thousands of loafs of bread a day
>one of his apostles is ashamed to ask for me
>"uygha shut yo ass up"
>gives him double the normal amount
>>

 No.114845

>>114844
>for me
for more
>>

 No.114876

File: 1627275838627.jpeg ( 41.91 KB , 739x415 , christian soy.jpeg )

>Jesus Christ was probably the first sigma male in history
>>

 No.115381

>>

 No.120998

gem


File: 1627745295095.jpg ( 425.9 KB , 1181x825 , R (61).jpg )

 No.120449[Reply]

So true! XD
>>

 No.120453

File: 1627745479311.jpg ( 65.25 KB , 640x590 , mfnra87wsm131.jpg )

>>

 No.120840

File: 1627754504255.jpg ( 141.71 KB , 900x557 , divided_states_of_triggere….jpg )

my kinda thread :)
>>

 No.120991

File: 1627762343364.jpg ( 106.18 KB , 430x800 , 1627762337655.jpg )

Try this
>>

 No.120995

>>120991
man this is some next level race math


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home