>>
No.411971
Stop daydreaming you autistic sperg
>>
No.411974
Where the fuck would you even put it?
>>
No.411975
How much is one unit?
>>
No.411980
>>4119754.5 Million dollars
>>
No.411986
>>411980Let's all pool in together a bit and send one to Cuba to protect them from subhuman counterrevolutionaries
>>
No.411987
>not stealing it
>>
No.412672
>>411983>costs more than the tankheh, nothing personal, kid.
>>
No.412676
Does it need keys?
>>
No.412712
>>412676It's not designed to be used by Americans, so presumably yes.
>>
No.412734
>>412672Yeah but america can afford tens of thousands of them. You cant afford tens of thousands of T-90s.
>>
No.412767
>>412734>Yeah but america can afford tens of thousands of them. You cant afford tens of thousands of T-90s.<stormbreakerit's a glidebomb, that can be denied by cheap AA
>>
No.412783
>>412767Its tiny and russian Pantsirs and Tors made horrible reputation in recent years in tracking small objects like drones and guided munitions. One of its intended uses is in fact SEAD/DEAD.
>>
No.412799
>>412783they probably just lacked a good enough radar signature for the targeting computer, that weakness seems like a very temporary thing.
>>
No.412805
>>412783>russian Pantsirs and Tors made horrible reputation in recent yearswut, they did a great job in Syria swatting drones and guided munitions(aside from the few cases where the Syrian soldiers decided to go take a smoke break rather than manning the guns). The questionable area is Libya, but those were UAE pantsirs without the whole radar set up and it's unknown who was actually crewing them.