>>
No.406932
>>406925>supporting the vietnam war>butUS side, right?
>>
No.406933
If he didn't support Stalin he's cringe
>>
No.406935
>>406932yeah
>In 1967, when he was sent to Vietnam to report on the war, his sympathetic portrayal of the United States Army led the New York Post to denounce him for betraying his liberal past. Steinbeck's biographer, Jay Parini, says Steinbeck's friendship with President Lyndon B. Johnson influenced his views on Vietnam. Steinbeck may also have been concerned about the safety of his son serving in Vietnam.In fairness alot of americans were pro vietnam I mean its possible that had he lived longer he would have turned against the war
>>406933>If he didn't support Stalin he's cringe>In 1939, he signed a letter with some other writers in support of the Soviet invasion of Finland and the Soviet-established puppet government. >>
No.407183
I couldn't imagine Steinbeck contemplating his legacy, and wondering if a future generation of soylent humans would ask if he was 'based or cringe'.
The fact is he lived 10x the life any of you ever will. Same for Orwell and London.
>>
No.407440
A fairly good writer portraying American working class life.
>>
No.407588
>>406932Based anti-revisionist
>>
No.407622
>>407022This. And unlike Steinbeck, London actually came from a working class background and knew firsthand the struggles of the proletariat.
>>
No.408227
>>407622Grapes of wrath is pretty based though
>>
No.413657
>>406925one of steinbeck's wives was apart of the communist party and she inspired some of his books
>>
No.413660
>>406925Based but he lived too long