>>398086>They literally are not though. Ok. I'm sure you're gonna actually make a case for why this is, rather than just start throwing around assertions.
>But retail and warehouse workers do not produce anything of utility.Yes they do. Even a socialist mode of production requires logistics and people to work the stores.
Maybe you should define production here. When I worked as a warehouseworker in my factory, recieving all the components and delivering them to the production lines I was not a proletarian, but when I got transfered to the lines to attatch a piece of cable to a device, I became a proletarian?
>Only in the footage of amazon warehouses does this even remotely make sense.Ok, so it only makes sense in the context of one of the biggest, fastest growingemployers in the US service sector that is indicative, once again, of the tendency if production to concentrate? I stnd corrected.
Besides, you're wrong. Every retail chain has massive warehouses that employ many warehouse workers. Warehouse workers also work at factories etc.
>Most warehouses are not even close to this and depend upon the labor of 1 - 2 people.What is the point you're trying to make? Most places where things are being produced are not 100+ worker factories either. Most warehouse workers I've met were either employed at a factory
>I am sensing some hostility to the fact that modern day workers may not be industrial proletariat. >the factThen what are we?
>It's easy to draw any conclusion you want though when you are allowed to cherry pick the argument of the opposition, though.No idea what this means.