No.396600
So, the second one isn't even worth responding to (even though we already had a response to that) because of "my dad works at nintendo"-tier bait and the obvious "cumism is when welth redristrubtion kek" strawman. The first one, although it looks somewhat genuine at first, completely falls apart IF you even have read ONE book of either Marx or Engels. Because he mentions the manifesto, I am assuming out of goodwill, that he has atleast read it once, although I have my doubts about that too because the "each according to his ability…. quote is quite popular among conservatives who love to take it out of context and building strawmans around it because they know that's the only way they can look somewhat educated on that subject. Now, i am only gonna mention the highlights of this masterpiece of idiocy because the rest is essentially filler that could have been written by the GPT-2 bot (not the newer one because that would give him too much credit).
>…without a free market to signal the value of goods…
just regular Austrian autism, not worth responding to
>Men are motivated to work more when they're rewarded for more effort.
only someone who has never read Marx would think that he would disagree here (although he would use a different wording here) i know that he talked about this specifically at one point but I don't care about it that much to actually look it up
>This is what happens in Communist systems: …..yada yada yada… which goes, "You pretend to pay me, and I pretend to work."
not too familiar with the soviet system in that regard but I do know that you got paid more (or got other incentives) if you have done more work, quite simple really, so more of a strawman
>Communism is only an idea and can't be implemented because of being one
first: he is contradicting himself, considering he used the Soviet Union as an example of a "Communist system"
secondly: ideas stop being "just ideas" once they get implemented
thirdly: there also exists an "ideal" version of capitalism which doesn't exist in the real world but that doesn't mean that capitalism doesn't exist (although some ancaps and libertarians argue exactly that) we have to remember that ideas and those ideals stemming from them always "deviate" from the real thing like how for example a production car always will look different than the concept car it is based on
Ok, so the rest is just bait at this point, like comparing Hegel to Jesus, calling a Marx a prophet who had an inner voice that "imparted to him" (spooky) and the biggest strawman of Marx by liberals and socdems alike: Historical Determism (Marx also specifically argued against this "hogwash" as he would call it)
Also calling "Dialectic Materialism" a "comsic force" instead of just another way to look at the world is quite, you know, quite something funny about it ngl.
Overall i would conclude that age of the author of this post is 15, higher than that I don't want to imagine.