>>393785>economic interdependence prevents warnot sure about that, it does create a lot of antagonisms, because everybody is trying to control their external dependencies.
>Will masses really accept war at this age?You mean like military conscription, no that would cause revolution the day it's announced. But the US for example has been able to use economic pressure to make poor people sign up for war. The people that fight for a paycheck probably aren't the most enthusiastic fighters, so they won't fight big wars.
>Aren't declining birthrates threats the potential soldier numbers?Yes but the big imperial bourgeoisie runs transnational operations and might not care about depleting the populations of several countries
>Aren't nuclear-nukes makes everyone afraid?Yes for governments, individual capitalists however might be more afraid about the stuff like precision drone strikes. Wars might create enough chaos where they could be targeted by commercial rivals.
>any global-war crush the world to irreversible point?A global war would disrupt the capitalist repression systems long enough for the formation of new soviet block type socialisms. But they wouldn't be like Stalin that only destroyed fascistic capitalism while letting bourgeois democratic capitalism live because WW3 would be viewed as proof that capitalism is irredeemable.
Overall the chances of a big war are lower than in past capitalist crisis, because the risks for the capitalist class are much greater now and the potential gains are smaller.