[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internets about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble


File: 1626942546685.jpeg ( 16.06 KB , 483x635 , images (24).jpeg )

 No.393785

So, i'm hearing that some anons claiming that before RoP hitting zero, they will do a war and save capital
But how much is that true? Will masses really accept war at this age? Aren't wars cost too much today ? Aren't declining birthrates threats the potential soldier numbers? Aren't global-economy connected to each other to point that, any global-war crush the world to irreversible point? Aren't nuclear-nukes makes everyone afraid?
>>

 No.393787

War is already happening bruh look around the world
>>

 No.393841

>>393785
It is going to be much worse than war. Like when Rome collapsed in the west, the great migrations of the 5th 6th - 9th century etc. Chaos and pillaging and genocide will ensue. Because I doubt that a communist revolution will win before this.
>>

 No.393845

>>393841
What are your proofs for them ?
>>

 No.393868

>>393785
I don't think you gonna have to wait till rate of profit hit zero. Given the situation at hand, most likely the big war gonna start near the next crisis give or take a couple of years. Tensions are already escalating and most major military powers are changing the structure of their military forces to suit big war (as opposed to "anti-terrorist" approach of small scale conflict from before). Look at how WWI started and it will give you a good picture of how the next one will start too.
>>

 No.393870

But where do you go to escape WW3?
>>

 No.393878

>>393870
Chile/Uruguay/Argentina or Singapore i believe
>>

 No.393895

>>393878
Singapore will be underwater by saturday
>>

 No.393905

>>

 No.393909

>>393870
Away from any industry centers and big cities. Military bases are bad news too.
>>

 No.393912

>>393841
The Roman Empire was an intensely unequal and brutally exploitative state that survived on slave labor and crushing taxation. Its collapse ushered forth a great leveling of wealth and social freedoms as the old aristocracy was destroyed and power was decentralized to the people.

The collapse of industrial capitalism will beget the greatest period of egalitarianism in generations, as the system that holds so many people in bondage finally dies. This period will only be remembered in hindsight as terrible and awful, because it won't leave behind skyscrapers and piles of cheap plastic crap.
>>

 No.393915

File: 1626954042263.png ( 281.82 KB , 480x360 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>393785
Larp time
Porky will try to continue progressively building deep state power through surveillance, terror , propaganda and reaction. The question is how will the different powers react to control/protect their own citizens before the others do and if there will be any sanity or power left to resist when the facade of liberal democracy falters.Will all tech be proprietary? Will every citizen have an exhaustive record of every hour of every day on some government database? Will we have chips in our brains by then?

You will eat the bugs and the patriot chip in your cyberbrain enclosure will help you like it.

It's for your own protection Anon, how could anybody tell you are not being puppeteered like those cyberterrorist attacks from <Enemy Designation> China , last year? The patriot chip certifies your cyberbrain enclosure as untampered by unauthorized persons.
>>

 No.393919

>So, i'm hearing that some anons claiming that before RoP hitting zero, they will do a war and save capital
War serves as a very literal method of 'capital DESTRUCTION' by either destroying the MOP (see: levelling of most of central and western-europes industrial centres / forced deindustrialisation of east-germany) of the people who man them (Self explanatory) OR the collapse of the losing powers economy in response to the armistice terms (Collapse of the German and Italian economies in the aftermath of WW1)
>But how much is that true? Will masses really accept war at this age?
Why wouldn't they lmao? The majority of my country wants us to die to protect Taiwan and thinks we should have the americans nuke the chinkos so they dont become to stronk. Many people i talk to are under the outright delusion of our armed forces of less then 100'000 people could beat the PLA.
>Aren't wars cost too much today ?
Until the Petrodollar and Breton-Woods system is abolished Murica can continue printing fiat self-backed by its own economic chokehold on earth
>Aren't declining birthrates threats the potential soldier numbers?
Wars dont require as many soldiers as they used to.
>>

 No.393934

File: 1626956040099.jpeg ( Spoiler Image, 7.43 KB , 225x225 , descarga (6).jpeg )

>>393878
>>393870
>>393909
>Not answering the question
Bruh
>>

 No.393935

>>393785
The likelihood of another world war is low, but, if it does happen, it will likely be pretty catastrophic. Go live in New Zealand or some other remote location if you want to avoid the worst of it.
>>

 No.393939

>>393785
>economic interdependence prevents war
not sure about that, it does create a lot of antagonisms, because everybody is trying to control their external dependencies.
>Will masses really accept war at this age?
You mean like military conscription, no that would cause revolution the day it's announced. But the US for example has been able to use economic pressure to make poor people sign up for war. The people that fight for a paycheck probably aren't the most enthusiastic fighters, so they won't fight big wars.
>Aren't declining birthrates threats the potential soldier numbers?
Yes but the big imperial bourgeoisie runs transnational operations and might not care about depleting the populations of several countries
>Aren't nuclear-nukes makes everyone afraid?
Yes for governments, individual capitalists however might be more afraid about the stuff like precision drone strikes. Wars might create enough chaos where they could be targeted by commercial rivals.
>any global-war crush the world to irreversible point?
A global war would disrupt the capitalist repression systems long enough for the formation of new soviet block type socialisms. But they wouldn't be like Stalin that only destroyed fascistic capitalism while letting bourgeois democratic capitalism live because WW3 would be viewed as proof that capitalism is irredeemable.

Overall the chances of a big war are lower than in past capitalist crisis, because the risks for the capitalist class are much greater now and the potential gains are smaller.
>>

 No.393944

>>393905
He’s being hyperbolic, but yea, Singapore is fucked by sea level rise

Unique IPs: 14

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome