>>392359If I understand correctly the implications of what you are saying… You are saying that, say, neolib/Randian/etc. think tanks paid shitton of moneys to "up" their search results inside Google's search, burying actual (factual) results. So it's not actual conscious censorship, just the profit motive doing its thing, correct?
Still, the end result is the same, no?
>>392466>>392469I actually do search parallel in duckduckgo, and I get the same results. Is it possibly that ddg.com actually take a lot of its results from google? I haven't tried yandex, tho (since it's russian language dominated)…
>>392472>things that didn't happen, pg. 1>>392474k