[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internets about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble


File: 1626359926765.png ( 313.42 KB , 502x548 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.379531[Last 50 Posts]

So the ECJ has just gone full mask off, it is now legal to fire workers for wearing a hijab. I wonder how this is going to end. Like surely this must be against at-least one EU country's constitution?
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/hijab-can-be-banned-at-work-rules-eu-court-g8px0mlms
>>

 No.379598

The ECJ deliberately left the details to the national courts to avoid conflict with the member states. It's a nothingburger. It's not like the countries on collision course with Bruxelles (Poland and Hungary) would care much about a hijab ban in the first place.
>>

 No.379659

If the EU starts enforcing state atheism I might just start supporting the neolibs tbh
>>

 No.379660

>>379659
Back to Reddit, my man.
>>

 No.379661

Imagine being so assblast over what another person wears on their own head.
>>

 No.379663

>inb4 we have to critically support religious fundamentalists to own the libs

it's all so tiresome
>>

 No.379665

>>379661

Not wearing it will get you flogged in at least a few countries.
>>

 No.379667

File: 1626363774150.png ( 1.82 MB , 1224x724 , 1549489538521.png )

>>379663
>inb4 we have to critically support religious fundamentalists to own the libs
i thought we already did that ?
>>

 No.379675

>>379663
>anyone wearing a hijab is a religious fundamentalist
looks like the war on terror propaganda has worked
>>

 No.379676

>>379663
Back to pol.

>>379665
>Because other countries do bad things to women not wearing it, we should not allow women all around Europe to wear it at work.
Brilliant logic.
>>

 No.379678

>>379665
and now wearing it will get you fired in a bunch of others
>>

 No.379682

>>379665
imagine caring either way, if someone was wearing a hat or not
>>

 No.379683

File: 1626364168245.png ( 197.89 KB , 840x564 , apu thinking.png )

Weren't hijabs banned/restricted in the past in Turkey and Tunisia? Do those countries also hate Muslims, or maybe there's an actual good reason to ban it?
>>

 No.379692

>>379683
dont know about tunisia, but turkey just did it because atatürk was ultra spooked and wanted to replace islamism with turkish ultra-nationalism by getting rid of anything that wasnt explicitly a copy of western nationalism.
>>

 No.379699

>>379683
there was a time when lib muslims pushed it as an extra now every muslims has been affected by wahabism to some extent
>>

 No.379708

>>379699
>now every muslims has been affected by wahabism to some extent
What the fuck are you even talking about.

>>379683
Because Mustafa Kemal was an ultranationalist, and a bourgeois liberal. The secular bourgeois ruled over the more religious proletariat for decades until Erdogan came along and appealed to the religious proletariat.
>>

 No.379714

>>379708
i was born in an era when it was accepted that the average muslim girl in the west doesnt need a hijab ,now lib muslims pushed the hijab is liberating shit
I am not saying that wearing it is bad or that i support the laws
>>

 No.379715

File: 1626364913705.jpg ( 34.26 KB , 400x600 , TheVirginInPrayer.JPG )

Will France also now destroy all their idols of the Virgin Mary in which she’s wearing a hijab?
>>

 No.379716

File: 1626364930320.jpg ( 378.72 KB , 1106x1500 , A1fAAFPCvFL._SL1500_.jpg )

>>379683
As much as I hate radlibs, they are right on the Hijab question. It is a symbol of opression as the whole concept of it is that a woman must cover herself as she is the property of her husband and only he can see her beauty. Otherwise she is a whore that is inviting rape. It promptes the reduction of women to property and sexual objects.

>Noooo she actually wants to wear it!1!1!1


Of course. She genuinely believes the above and that's fucking sad. This thing is not a fashion piece but a symbol of psychological indoctrination and reactionary brainrot. This site is filled by mentally ill terminally online children that believe they have to support everything a person who isn't a communist opposes. Things aren't black and white and life isn't a soccer game with teams.

>inb4 banned by jannoids for staying true to original marxist dogma
>>

 No.379720

>>379715

Hopefully
>>

 No.379721

>>379716
Nah telling adults what to wear will back fire just say school girls shouldnt wear them and help girls avoid abusive enviroments
>>

 No.379724

>>379716
Yeah because that worked great in Kemalist turkey…
>>

 No.379725

>>379683
They were banned so much in Turkey that a man won an election on relegismising them in public spaces: His name was Erdogan…
>>

 No.379732

>>379716
This isn't Marxist dogma, this is pop atheism.

>Things aren't black and white

Your idea of religion is.
>>

 No.379736

>>379732
>This isn't Marxist dogma, this is pop atheism.

Atheism and anti- spiritualism is a core marxist principle. I don't know what the fuck pop atheism is or that atheism came in different flavors
>>

 No.379738

Funnily enough, never see people saying men can't wear the Yarmulke, taqiyah, or Dastar…
>>

 No.379739

>>379736
t. never read what Marx actually wrote about religion. You realise when he called it the opiate of the masses he wasn't saying it was a bad thing, right?
>>

 No.379741

>>379738
same reason you have never seen people saying sikh women shouldnt cover retard
>>

 No.379742

File: 1626365714049.jpg ( 259.87 KB , 1242x1388 , 087.jpg )

>>379738

I'm saying it.
>>

 No.379747

>>379739

He said it was useful as a cope but harmful for the liberation of the human mind and antithetical to materialist thinking
>>

 No.379751

Based. All religion is reactionary and shouldn't be catered to.
>>

 No.379755

>>379660

I'm banned on literally every subreddit except the porn ones, but that's because I don't comment on them
>>

 No.379757

>>379531
>leftypol when porky fires workers: NOOO STOP NOOOO
>leftypol when porky fires muslim workers: YAAASSS I LIKE NEOLIBERALISM NOW
Holy shit the faggotry itt is unbelieveable
>>

 No.379759

>>379755
damn man ,that's hardcore
>>

 No.379760

>>379757

I'm not saying they should fire them. I'm just saying they should be banned in general.
>>

 No.379764

>>379757
understanding that religion and the religious are retarded isn't the same as loving capitalism
>>

 No.379772

>>379764

This is literally what I'm trying to say. I can hate both
>>

 No.379775

>>379760
>>379764
>>379772
Look at the OP and the people celebrating and say that again
>>

 No.379778

If a communist government does this, it's a necessary step on the way to a secular society. If a capitalist one does it, it's just another way to fire people.
>>

 No.379783

File: 1626367128529.jpeg ( 14.84 KB , 210x239 , download.jpeg )

>>379716
> staying true to original marxist dogma
pain
>>

 No.379787

File: 1626367379817.jpg ( 33.65 KB , 600x600 , st,small,507x507-pad,600x6….jpg )

>>379778

*DING* *DING* *DING*

we have a winner
>>

 No.386001

File: 1626625987371-0.pdf ( 1019.63 KB , 351x300 , Fanon - Algeria Unveiled.pdf )

File: 1626625987371-1.jpg ( 133.05 KB , 1400x934 , khateeb at rally.jpg )

>>379683
>>379716
>>379751
>Neoliberal governments destroy a colonized people's religious identity for the sake of increasing profits
>"Communists" on here support them
>Even as revolutionary women in Iraq, Algeria, Palestine, Iran, and the rest of MENA have shown that one can wear a Hijab and still fight for socialism and national liberation
Holy shit, you guys need to go read Fanon already, he even wrote an extremely specific essay about how unveiling efforts under colonialism and capitalism are blatantly imperial in their efforts to subjugate Muslim women. Please, just take the time to read the attached Fanon piece, it should hopefully dispel such colonial apologetics.
>inb4 I'm a religious fundamentalist / Mautist / revisionist
One can be an atheist Marxist while still upholding the rights of a colonized people to maintain their identity through veiling, which as people like Suhad al-Khateeb (pic related) have demonstrated, does not necessarily have to entail patriarchy and subjugation. Sure, reactionary regimes like the Gulf States and Iran have weaponized veiling as a force of patriarchal subjugation, but that doesn't inherently damn the wearing of the hijab, which instead can often maintain anti-colonial identity. Certainly, reactionary governments like those of Turkey and the Shah's Iran had done the exact opposite, discouraging the hijab not for women's emancipation, but rather to further subjugate the population to Western designs.
The only coherent Marxist, anti-imperial position is to wholeheartedly oppose Western attempts at eradicating the Hijab as well as other aspects of destroying Arab and Islamic identity. If revolutionary Arab governments choose to either allow or do away with the Hijab, that's up to them, but to allow Western powers to destroy Islamic wear in the name of commercial profit is pure idiocy. To be quite frank, it's a shame to see War on Terror rhetoric posted by so-called-revolutionaries.
>>

 No.386005

File: 1626626135652.jpg ( 37.16 KB , 573x652 , france moment teacher.jpg )

>>379531
>when you defend secularism like a boss by explicitly targeting one 'alien' religion to defend your totally not-catholic native culture
>>

 No.386031

File: 1626627239758.webm ( 4.25 MB , 540x360 , nasser.webm )

>>

 No.386034

>>379531
based EU for once
why do I have to abide by corporate dresscode when some religious faggot that doesn't even truly believe in his own bullshit gets a pass?
>>

 No.386050

>>386001
Hijab is subjugated to consumerist fashion culture
Hijab as is intended in europe is product of the islamic reactioanry wave
Hijab doesn't predate colonialism in most islamic contries
Islam is not a monolith
Fanon is cringe
>>

 No.386103

>>386001
Fanon is such a fucking brainlet
>>

 No.386140

>>386050
>>386103
Scratch a leftypolak and a polak bleeds
>>

 No.386167

So glad we left the eu.
>>

 No.386242

>>386001
>which instead can often maintain anti-colonial identity
Not only a spook but not even pre colonial as Iraq adopted veiling because the ottoman empire.
>>

 No.386258

>>379663
wearing hijab doesn't make you a fundie lmao. there are women who wear the face veil even who still date and drink. it doesn't have that much correlation with religiosity tbh
>>379716
I wear hijab and I don't believe any of that bullshit. it's just comfy and gives me gender euphoria. plus I like the sense of privacy
>>386001
thanks for the pdf. some islamic customs such as m/fgm are inherently oppressive and must be combatted but veiling is not one of them imo
>>

 No.386272

>>386001
>Holy shit, you guys need to go read Fanon already

I've read Fanon where he talks about the foreign capitalists using religious mystification to keep the population detached from reality, fighting among themselves and unable to act in a progressive manner, what about that part?
>>

 No.386286

File: 1626637909945.png ( 209.28 KB , 300x300 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.386292

>>386258
are you unironically a transhumanist and a muslim convert?
>>

 No.386680

>we need to liberate women from patriarchal and religious oppression as well as backward bodyshaming
>*hijab ban enacted*
>wait, no, we didn't mean it, let's keep the backward headscarf women are forced to wear lest we become islamophobic fascists!
This retardation is what makes people not take the left seriously.
>>

 No.386690

>>386258
You're the female equivalent of a cuck.
>>

 No.386722

>>379667
>>379675
>>379676
>>386286
>>386258
you're all some fucking faggots, why should we allow a literal symbol of feudal clan societal tyranny engineered to enforce patriarchal roles in society in a socialist society?
>>

 No.386730

I know porky is just gonna use this to fuck worker rights but hijabs are actually p cronge
>>

 No.386737

>>386258
>it's just comfy and gives me gender euphoria.
this is why ppl throw u nighas out of rooftops
>>

 No.386752

>>386722
I don't care about the hijab I care about the fact that it lets Porkies divide and attack the workers, you cuck
>>

 No.386764

>>379531
IDPOL, not relevant. Doesn't matter if hijab banned or not, this does not intrinsically anti-Imperialism, class conflict or COVID. It's a fight for liberals not left's.
>>

 No.386805

>>386050
>>386103
>>386242
I'm not claiming that veiling itself is a byproduct of colonialism, I'm saying that for a Western power to forcibly unveil women for the sake of profit is about as colonialist as it gets. I don't know how you could derive that my position is for monolithic and forceful veiling.
Also Fanon is based as fuck, man was one of the most principled anti-colonialists of the 20th Century. I really don't know why any Marxist would dislike him.

>>386272
Yep, sure, I agree. Colonial powers do definitely encourage fundamentalism and reactionary thought as means of diverting the national liberation struggle. This problem has been especially present in the Arab world, with the Gulf States and its fundamentalist peers acting as active vassals for imperialism. That's why progressive Arab orgs like the PFLP acknowledge Arab reaction as an active partner of world imperialism. That still doesn't change the fact that all of these progressive orgs have never forcefully demanded unveiling as a means of "liberating women". Hell, the ICP, PFLP, FLN, and plenty of others all have very visible female comrades who wear the veil as they simultaneously fight for progress, women's rights, and national liberation.

I think all of this fearmongering over hijabs and other veils is desperately out of touch from actual Muslim women, and in particular progressive Muslim women who often wear the hijab as a sign of empowerment. As one of the anons I responded to said, Islam is not a monolith, and it's ridiculous to imagine that voluntary veiling by progressive Muslim women, a right that is being threatened by this EU ruling, is anywhere near comparable to the repressive forced veiling of places like the Gulf states.
>>

 No.386807

>>386292
I mean, if the Ayatollah says it's alright, I don't see why not.
>>

 No.387001

>>386805
>I'm saying that for a Western power to forcibly unveil women for the sake of profit is about as colonialist as it gets. I don't know how you could derive that my position is for monolithic and forceful veiling.
You know in many muslims countries veiling is banned in the workplace too?
> FLN, and plenty of others all have very visible female comrades who wear the veil as they simultaneously fight for progress, women's rights, and national liberation.
Lmao, the FLN after the revolution forced to veil women and then banned the communist party. Nice comrades. That's the kind of shit that i'm talking about.
>I'm not claiming that veiling itself is a byproduct of colonialism
I'm claiming this. Go read when veiling was adopted in most countries and come here to tell me again about muh pre colonial identity and other bullshit
>>

 No.387011

>>386722
>>386722
It's a scarf you schizo
>>

 No.387013

>>379675
>>379667
>>379663
The hijab as it's worn in the West (yes, The West) isn't really about fundamentalism. It's worn by stupid fucking hipsters that are oblivious to the type and variety of head coverings used by Muslim women in various countries and the reasons why they are worn, and are being useful idiots for the ruling-class culture exported by Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
>>

 No.387145

File: 1626671117011.jpg ( 19.43 KB , 336x260 , irritated.jpg )

It's one more excuse that makes it easier to fire workers, but the head scarf is also a very overt religious symbol. It's kinda hard to defend in your face religious symbolism, because it's kinda irritating.
>>

 No.387238

>>379531
>Like surely this must be against at-least one EU country's constitution?
Who gives a shit? You do know that the French has been killing millions throughout the world with colonialism under the banners of: “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” right? It’s just fanciful newspeak to justify fascism.
>>

 No.387266

Fuck religion, fuck Islam, fuck sexism and fuck (you)
>>

 No.387284

>>379531
Based EU, for once.
There is no place for religion in socialism. You can seethe all you want, your ultrareactionary cult will not be tolerated. Islam in particular is religious form of fascism in questions of family, women, queers. If libs throw a wrench into it, its good!
>>

 No.387300

What I love about this is that some spergs may think this is good cuz it discriminates against Muslims but in actuality it's in general an anti religion, secular law. And soon conservativism itself will get banned in the work place.
>>

 No.387320

>>387300
Based. I used to campaign with a couple of friends in Highschool to remove Icons from classrooms and replace religion classes with general studies of various religions. This board wont be happy until leftism is reactionary in everything but name.
>>

 No.387330

Context is important.

In this case it is basically a bourgeois diversion and not particularly progressive except if only the superficial form is taken into consideration.

However, when nationalists and Arab revolutionaries do it to revolt against feudal spooks there is a very different sort of character at play then.
>>

 No.387469

>>387145
>It's kinda hard to defend in your face religious symbolism, because it's kinda irritating.
t. coastal liberal
idc if my coworkers wanna wear massive crosses or little jew hats so long as I have my own freedom of expression. there's a difference between seperation of church and state and trying to excise anything to do with religion from the public sphere entirely
>>

 No.387480

>>387469
>muh freedum
>>

 No.387548

>>387469
how can religious people argue that it's about their personal freedoms when they always impede that of others?
eat shit, get a good taste of it, you have long deserved it
oh, you want solidarity now? how is that working out when it's towards people that will go to hell in your spooky holy book?
the shit. you have to eat it. better yet, choke on it.
>>

 No.387550

File: 1626700034999.jpg ( 56.83 KB , 600x400 , turkey-ankara-ataturk-muse….jpg )

Fuck literally everyone ITT
>>

 No.387553

>>387548
it's a fucking scarf dude
>>

 No.387554

>>387553
and they cry so much about it
delicious
>>

 No.387562

>>387554
you also sound pretty emotional
>>

 No.387567

File: 1626700538051.jpeg ( 46.22 KB , 836x557 , Listen here you litle chu….jpeg )

Islamofascism is a major threat to the advancement of proletarian struggle across the planet by implementing reactionary economic (slave labor in Qatar and Saudi Arabia for example) and cultural (Hijab, Sharia, etc) measures to spread their repressive ideology which is wholly incompatible with what we stand for. For the Left to become an effective political force, it needs to begin questioning it's own Orientalism as it obfuscates analysis of the political situation by capitulating to Left-Liberalism in order to be politically correct.
>>

 No.387568

>>387562
i can't and don't want to deny my schadenfreude
>>

 No.387570

>>387568
sorry i can't read scat porn subtitles
>>

 No.387572

It raises the issue about where secular values take precedence over religious. Capital is the secular god, and within the sphere of private property it may establish any regulations so long as they comply with the law. If a company requires you to wear a gimp suit as a uniform you are obligated to do so or else they have a right to fire you. If they don't like face tattoos and you have them, that's not discrimination.

Is it any different when it comes to religious trappings? Concessions are typically made for religious holidays and other exceptions, but having your face fully visible might be construed as a business requirement .
>>

 No.387575

>>387567
Islamofascism is a major threat to other Muslims more than anything and is a tool of Western imperialism to control the Middle East. See: Iraq and Syria. Iran has been the greatest enemy of so-called Islamofascism. The left is correct in generally critically supporting Iran and its allies like Hezbollah (or even Assad), and this sentiment is disconnected from left-liberal sentiments around cultural tolerance. This isn't to say I'm against the left-liberal viewpoint, in fact I'm a bit sympathetic.
>>

 No.387583

>>387572
>so long as they comply with the law.
It's more accurate to say that the law must comply with private property.
>>

 No.387584

>>379659
And that's all it took, huh? A mild sauce law aimed at keeping Europe remotely European. 95% of you will be neolibs by age 30. And that's a good thing.
>>

 No.387612

>>387584
oh fuck off, if colonial India had banned monocles you would've been up in arms about white discrimination and intolerance
>>

 No.388128

>>387001
>You know in many muslims countries veiling is banned in the workplace too?
Yes I'm well aware that some Muslim countries have discouraged full face and body veils in the workplace. Others have gone further in pursuit of Westernization and have cracked down upon the hijab and other veils in their entirety. While I think there are reasons why certain workplaces might crack down on full-body veils, efforts to eradicate the hijab in its entirety have been exclusively pursued by the most absurdly pro-west, liberal Muslim nations like Turkey, the Shah's Iran, and Tunisia. I think such efforts reflect not any sort of cultural relativity, but rather deliberate efforts to crush Islamic tradition in pursuit of "Westernization". Given the track records of the nations I just listed, I think it would be inane to suppose that they were progressive by any means.
>Lmao, the FLN after the revolution forced to veil women and then banned the communist party. Nice comrades. That's the kind of shit that i'm talking about.
Where the Hell did you ever get the notion that the FLN has made veiling mandatory? If you actually look at Algeria, the hijab is by no means mandatory, not to mention most of the women comrades in the FLN didn't veil. If you even just look up "algerian women", you will find many, many women who choose to go without veils, including FLN legends like Djamila Bouhired. I have no idea where you're getting such a claim. The most I can find saying something remotely similar to that is an Independent article claiming that the Algerian Civil War made veiling mandatory, and even if that were to somehow be the case, that clearly is no longer true, nor was it true before the Civil War. And yes, the banning of the communist party was a misstep, but the Cold-War era FLN was still a laudable movement for national liberation, it's disingenuous to paint them as any sort of closet reactionaries, at least before their liberalization. I also noticed that from my original sentence, you conveniently left out that explicitly ML orgs like the PFLP and the ICP also fully tolerate veiling.
>I'm claiming this. Go read when veiling was adopted in most countries and come here to tell me again about muh pre colonial identity and other bullshit
Well then you're wrong, veiling has a rich history that predates Islam, and while it was by no means an absolute presence within all of Islam, it still had a wide presence in the Islamic world in the aftermath of the Arab conquests. Hell, veiling became particularly prominent in the Ottoman Empire long before Christian Europe started colonizing. For fuck's sake, even medieval Christian societies had widespread veiling, not to mention whole other groups of non-Muslim MENA societies. I don't know how you can honestly think that veiling was some sort of modern invention, that's just blatantly wrong.

>>387011
Thank you, idk why everyone is making it out to be some sort of mark of evil patriarchy when it's literally just a headscarf, no more "despotic" than a Christian woman dressing modestly. Hell, even in the most fervent periods of the Soviet Hujum, the Soviets never outright banned veiling. At most, veiling simply shifted from more traditional veils to more modern ones. I don't see why these people feel the need to get so enraged over something as frankly inoffensive as a headscarf; it honestly just makes me think that very few of them have actually interacted with a hijabi.
>>

 No.388197

>>388128
NTA, but isn't the ugly ass shit in pic related or what 90's percent of muslim wear these days basically a new invention? I can't find any match to it in pre islamic culture nor in any traditional clothing.
>>

 No.388243

>>387550
>turk LARPing as a bourgeois frenchmen
>oppresses proletariat because they are religious
>>

 No.388424

File: 1626731582396.jpg ( 346.61 KB , 774x936 , hijab star wars.jpg )

>>387548
how am I personally impeding your freedom? and why do you assume I think you're going to hell? I'm a follower of master fard muhammad, not an orthodox muslim; I don't believe in mystery gods or the afterlife (maybe reincarnation though)
>>387572
hijab doesn't cover the face you fucking retard
>>387612
kek
>>

 No.388436

>>379738
I’m saying no one should be allowed to wear anything
>>

 No.388451

>>388128
>Islamic tradition
t. Qatar
>>

 No.388891

>>388197
Yeah, the modern hijab as we know it is new (and I also agree in preferring more traditional veils), but veiling itself is extremely ancient and common. Plus, I imagine this EU rule would equally apply to traditional Islamic veils just as much as it would modern hijabs.

>>388451
>defending the forceful stripping of post-colonial Islamic identity for the sake of commercial profit
t. Mohammed Reza Pahlavi
>>

 No.388905

>>388891
stay in your colony then, sandfag
>>

 No.388993

>>388424
>I'm a follower of master fard muhammad,

What led you to believing in the Nation of Islam over Orthodox Islam?
>>

 No.389392

File: 1626761329064.jpg ( 239.18 KB , 1536x2048 , a9c6ee505b08bda609f752d67e….jpg )

>>388891
>post-colonial Islamic identity
You are a clown
>>

 No.389691

>>386001
The Hijab is literally a foreign Arab Islamic imperilst design
>>386258
Listen Arab worshipper, the concept of the veil was stated by an Arab Pedophile with a small dick, It was forced on my people through centuries of subjugation
>>

 No.389734

>>388424
you're a scientologist, not a muslim

>>388993
being an american larper probably
>>

 No.389738

>>388424
>I'm a follower of master fard muhammad
>I wear hijab and I don't believe any of that bullshit. it's just comfy and gives me gender euphoria
are you unironically a transhumanist and a muslim convert to the scientologist branch of it?
This is what buck breaking does to a mf
>>

 No.389739

>>389691
>supporting western imperialism in hopes of getting your pre-islamic culture back
anon, i…
>>

 No.389740

>>389691
>>389739
nevermind the fact that the veil predates islam, of course
>>

 No.389750

>>389739
>supporting gulf state imperialism as a way to signal your post colonial identity
>>389740
He's referring to the ugly as shit people wear these days
>>

 No.389755

>>389739
I don't need an Arab worshipper whose more pathetic
>>

 No.389763

>>387013
I see a lot of Arab/Muslim looking people wearing hijabs in Europe. I know what you're saying though, there was this group of ultra TERF feminists that started adopting Islam as progressive feminism. Wild shit. They also insisted that lesbianism was a critical part of feminism. There's some wild people out there, but I doubt the Arab 60 year old brown lady speaking Arabic to her grandchildren while wearing a hijab in Europe is a hipster.
>>

 No.389774

File: 1626778621450.png ( 108.16 KB , 1270x1136 , burger pagan.png )

>>389755
you're literally pic related
>>

 No.389806

File: 1626780073659.jpeg ( 254.98 KB , 1270x1136 , zoroastrian spurdo.jpeg )

>>389774
closer to this
>>

 No.390380

File: 1626798875840.png ( 781.44 KB , 1107x741 , muslim truck drivers.png )

>>388993
cultural affinity I guess. reading malcolm and listening to brand nubian is what got me interested in the religion in the first place. in particular I really appreciate the five percenters' emphasis on self/community improvement. also I'm an afrocentrist
>>389691
how am I an arab worshipper? I believe the black man is god. I'm sorry about your ancestors or whatever, but the veil actually comes from byzantines and persians afaik
>>389734
aside from the bit about ufos scientology isn't really that similar to noi theology, regardless of farrakhan's baffling endorsement of dianetics
>>389738
>buck breaking
I'm white
>>

 No.390402

>>390380
>I'm white
are you unironically a transhumanist, a muslim convert to the scientologist branch of it that talk about white devils and belives in unironic yakub shit while being white?
You should kys unironically
>>

 No.390406

>>390380
>I believe the black man is god
Yeah, you watched too much porn i think
>>

 No.390425

>>379531
Usualy, the EU only serve corpos, but this time, they are right. Religions should be illegal.

Something something with the tripes of the last priest/imam.
>>

 No.390431

>>390406
I can count on one hand how many times I've looked at porn since I converted 3 years ago. it does nothing for me anymore
>>

 No.390434

>>390402
Go back
>>

 No.390440

>>390434
Lmao. Are you serious?
>>

 No.390461

File: 1626801345503.jpg ( 13.15 KB , 500x334 , E6ieaGAWYAAntL0.jpg )

>>390402
>transhumanist, a muslim convert to the scientologist branch of it that talk about white devils and belives in unironic yakub shit while being white
Based
>>

 No.390470

>>390440
I'm never serious
>>

 No.390766

>>390461
it's like people think being a leftist means you have to be humourless and boring
>that image
10/10
>>

 No.390800

>>390766
So you're saying you were only pretending?
>>

 No.391069

>>390800
no, I'm saying that people on this board act like anyone who isn't a nu atheist is schizo. I do think you gotta have a sense of humour to study new religious movements though. which is what I do (mostly the NOI but a little bit about bahaism, paganism, and rastafari too)
>>

 No.391112

>>390380
>cultural affinity I guess. reading malcolm and listening to brand nubian is what got me interested in the religion in the first place. in particular I really appreciate the five percenters' emphasis on self/community improvement. also I'm an afrocentrist

Did Malcolm's leaving of the NOI for Islam impact your view on it at all? I can understand the enjoyment/appeal of a religion that places emphasis on self improvement - 7th Day Adventism and Scientology for instance, but how do you go from liking the self help part to accepting the other pretty extreme claims?

>I'm white

How does that work out in practice? Are you a sole practitioner or has the local NOI group made some special provision for you.
>>

 No.391161

>>391112
I think malcolm was right irt "not waiting for god to do all the work" of liberating black people, and wanting to cooperate with the few white people who actually supported him. I assume what he said about elijah muhammad's infidelity was true as well; he would have been the one to know after all. but I do feel like malcolm's attempt to blaze his own path is what left him isolated and got him killed in the end. idk, it's hard to say tbh, I'm sympathetic to both sides. I like farrakhan a lot but I wouldn't be surprised if he had something to do with malcolm's death. I blame cointelpro more than anything though
the five percent nation has a more practical and I would say radical interpretation of master fard's teachings than the noi proper anyway
>how do you go from liking the self help part to accepting the other pretty extreme claims?
well, the extreme theological claims can be taken as metaphors based on true historical claims. the full first degree is "the asiatic blackman is the original man, the maker, the owner, cream of the planet earth, father of civilisation, god of the universe." the abrahamic religions are definitely borrowed from african traditions, or one could say stolen, since they don't give credit where it's due, instead prefering to stamp everyone else out. not to mention the kemetic origin of a lot of the sciences. it's about correcting the record I guess, as much as I hate to use that phrase
>How does that work out in practice?
there aren't that many muslims here in general so I kind of just read about stuff on my own. I'm hoping to attend some muslim student association meetings soon and make some friends, though
>>

 No.391596

>>388424
NOI anon have you got a good recipe for bean pie?
>>

 No.391679

File: 1626854807652.jpg ( 24.27 KB , 640x500 , df797cfc1d607de467fa66c810….jpg )

America = More progressive than Europoor. End of.(You can ilaugh all you want in Vorkuta)
>>

 No.391705

>>391679
I don't think you know what progressive means
>>

 No.391785

>>391069
You are a white transsexual who's a Nation of Islam convert and call other people schizo?
>>

 No.391788

File: 1626860184922.jpg ( 108.35 KB , 932x582 , 6ZDUMDUHQ5G5RP3NBYIQBT355Y.jpg )

>>379715
Nah, Macron is going full Catholic reactionary and islamophobic.
Picture is him at Lourdes few days ago. First French head of state visiting the place since Pétain
>>

 No.391793

>>391788
Do you think he is sincere in it ideologically? Or is it just appealing to the changing political climate, for voters?
>>

 No.391799

>>391793
>is a head of state in 2021 sincere about x ?
kek
>>

 No.391801

>>391793
I don't think he is sincere at all. He lost almost all his center-left supporters (who went to the Greens) so to have any chance to win in next year elections, he has to appeal to the conservative/reactionary right.
The center-right and the liberal right support him already anyway.
>>

 No.391988

>oppression and degradation of female comrades should be allowed in any case, religious or otherwise
You’re a bad communist and invested in spooks
>>

 No.393078

>>391988
>stop oppressing yourselves by embracing your own inferior culture you sanduyghurs
>>

 No.393699

File: 1626934091341-0.jpeg ( 352.98 KB , 1124x1840 , dsfdsdcfvb.jpeg )

File: 1626934091341-1.jpeg ( 183.93 KB , 1124x1804 , sdfgbvcxsddf.jpeg )

hmmm wait a minute

Unique IPs: 77

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome