>>309138Pick up a book retard.
> Marxism is a normative theoryMarxism isn't a fucking "theory" or some dogmatic bullshit like that
> Starving off the workshy and other undesirablesFuck off with this fascist garbage. "He who doesn't work doesn't eat" only holds true under the lower stage of socialism. Unemployment in the "reserve army of labor" is an inevitable fact under capitalism. Reforming and healing alcoholics, prostitutes, druggies, etc. will obviously be an incredibly laborious process, but it can only start once the proletariat is in power.
> Some more garbage about "le human nature"The proletariat is deprived of property, so that they cannot survive without selling their labor power to a capitalist. Is this "human nature"?
> Some more garbage about "ambition"Is exploitation of the working classes "ambition"?
> Why would a brain surgeon want to make as much as a burger flipper?No one "makes" a wage in communist society. Communism abolishes the division of labor and universally educates people to the highest possible extent, which makes it possible for anyone "to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic."
> Communism therefore occurs when everyone is equally poor.Name even ONE text where Marx or Engels ever argues this. Capitalism has already centralized and socialized every single industry in the world, yet everything still continues to be under private dominion. Communism only returns the already-socialized means of production back into the hands of society, which is infinitely easier than the arduous task of socializing the means of production which was accomplished by capitalism.
< Crude communism [the manuscript has: Kommunist. – Ed.] is only the culmination of this envy and of this levelling-down proceeding from the preconceived minimum. It has a definite, limited standard. How little this annulment of private property is really an appropriation is in fact proved by the abstract negation of the entire world of culture and civilisation, the regression to the unnatural || IV ||IV| simplicity of the poor and crude man who has few needs and who has not only failed to go beyond private property, but has not yet even reached it.< Marx in the 1844 Manuscripts> Human nature is game theoryFuck off with this pseudoscientific garbage. Your use of "game theory" already pre-supposes the rules of the game. You're already *assuming* the existence of property, wages, capital, etc. when you argue that people *inevitably* navigate these categories according to their interests.