>>369381>Promoting insane PoMo RadLib junk-ideology etc) It wouldn't be very suprising for them also to be a rapist or a nonce or something else retardedReading or promoting Judith Butler isn't going to turn you into a rapist or nonce.
You might as well argue that traditional (medieval or classical ) metaphysics turns you into a rapist or nonce. Given the numbers of child molesters in the Catholic priesthood. They haven't been reading Judith Butler.
I didn't get some of the argument in the video about " clusters" . I think it was what clusters of properties constitute what things really "are" in a metaphysical sense.
So "gender critical" feminists are going to say it's certain bodily properties, like having a womb, which make someone a woman.
But then there's an obvious counter argument, is someone still a woman after a hysterectomy? Obviously they are.
But then, the counter to the counter is yea, but wombs are important because of reproduction and women's role in it, unpaid labour. Which is the area of political contestation. But then that's not really purely bodily and physical either.