[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/b/ - Siberia

"We need an imageboard of action to fight for OC making posters."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble


File: 1627676318763.png ( 211.65 KB , 880x1189 , 5871358_astolfo-astolfo-sc….png )

 No.119752[Last 50 Posts]

what the fuck was his fucking problem?
>>

 No.119766

File: 1627677190089.webm ( 7.82 MB , 640x288 , JapanVictoryMarch.webm )

Revenge for Nagasaki
>>

 No.119771

Being a war criminal.
>>

 No.119776

He had a problem?
>>

 No.119777

>>119766
i don't get the meaning behind the dance
>>

 No.120103

>>119766
It backfired hard
Letting millions of men understand the meaning of femininity is not much of a revenge.
>>

 No.120358

>>120103
>being fucked in the ass
>the meaning of feminity
You will never…
>>

 No.120359

Employed by a company dedicated to fan service.
>>

 No.120379

File: 1627736061879-0.png ( 574.87 KB , 707x1000 , 5a95faec0f8f9758e42b1ae937….png )

File: 1627736061879-1.jpeg ( 113.63 KB , 848x1200 , 512acf2dac3d23503f65286e4….jpeg )

File: 1627736061879-2.jpg ( 219.05 KB , 850x1119 , sample_8b86902527ef3b018ec….jpg )

File: 1627736061879-3.jpg ( 227.15 KB , 850x905 , sample_8e87050f32ce7a1bb42….jpg )

>>119752
Was not dicked enough
>>

 No.120389

>>120358
Lose virginity, chinlet

Astolfo is certainly more feminine than at least 90% of the shit you fap to
>>

 No.120392

>>120389
There is no such thing as a "feminine" guy its childish features, you are a pedo bro.
>>

 No.120397

>>

 No.120400

File: 1627739530180.jpg ( 1.01 MB , 1839x1621 , IMG_20210730_233446.jpg )

>>120392
Actually it applies to women too. Everybody loves a young looking, hairless, small woman, usually one who just turned 18, despite the fact that it was bourgeois pedophilic beauty standards that led them to be like that.
Maybe try being attracted to a bush hairy armpits, and a strong large mature body. That's what a woman actually naturally looks like.
>>

 No.120401

>>120400
>anfem flag
>umm..j-junko is that you?
>>

 No.120402

>120392
>120397
Bruh. Men only look masculine because of tesosterone. If you are male and have really low T than you will look androgynous and it would be easy to make yourself look feminine, some men even have naturally high estrogen production. I mean I kind of get your point because boys that haven't finished puberty will look more feminine, but so do some adult men.
>>

 No.120403

>120401
odds are higher it's someone trolling
>>

 No.120434

>120403
although I agree actually lol
>>

 No.120440

Learn to quote people Jewish nigger.
>>

 No.120458

>>120400
Thats what women who dont take care of themselves look like and hairy armpits are gross, they stink and are full of accumulated sweat which specifically these "all natural" women dont get out with their flower oils. Gross, but women also are not these tiny, super soft desu things faggots like to fetishize them as.
These uwu "femboys" go through great lengths to look like some anime protagonist and the end product reminds me more of a little boy than a woman, with their slim hips and flat chests, there is nothing "feminine" about it.
The best analogy I can come up with is Humber Humbert in Nabokovs Lolita, who before he met Dolores would pay young looking prostitutes to pretend they are school girls while fucking them and irl there is quite a few whores who specialize in appealing to these fantasies.
Its the same case with glorifying this "femboy" shit, its projecting something deeply hidden on an older guy who plays dress up, relating "femininity" to this is just a cope and attempt to justify and downplay it before both other as well as themselves. Its also an insult to actual women.

Its not homosexuality thats for sure, there is a lot of slim men who didnt do hard labor in the sun and look like Chuck Norris for it, why this obsession with 18 year olds on estrogen pills? And if you are so much into "femininity" why dont you just have sex with women? You know you dont have to look at their vagina all the time.
Boomers didnt act like this man, its all these late millenials and zoomers whose brains were fried on anime.

Idk, its quite sickening that these perversions seem to be grow more acceptable, but I guess apathy is the sign of a decaying society.
>>

 No.120460

>>120458
Why get sand in your vagina about what someone else is attracted to?
>>

 No.120464

>>120460
Go fuck yourself you dumb pederast
>>

 No.120466

File: 1627746355747.png ( 239.89 KB , 756x870 , Further analysis indicates….png )

>>120458
Weird thing to write an entire essay about this shit but okay
>>

 No.120467

File: 1627746417521.png ( 378.26 KB , 1564x1391 , 1621992504355.png )

>Weird thing to write an entire essay about this shit but okay
>>

 No.120468

>>120467
go back
>>

 No.120475

>>120466
>12 paragraphs
>essay
Of course the avatarfag doesnt do any reading.
>>

 No.120476

File: 1627746774030.png ( 164.09 KB , 500x647 , implausible sparkliness.png )

>>120475
It's called exaggeration buddy, common literary device.
>>

 No.120477

>>120400
>That's what a woman actually naturally looks like.
I fucking wish that was true
>>

 No.120478

File: 1627746856058.png ( 15.6 KB , 454x520 , 1623453204635.png )

>It's called exaggeration buddy, common literary device.
>>

 No.120479

>>120464
Nah but am I wrong tho?
>>

 No.120480

>>120478
go back
>>

 No.120482

File: 1627746967441.png ( 397.53 KB , 520x728 , 1621632248989.png )

>>

 No.120487

>>120479
>dude dont think about anything bro just go with the flow and never reflect on the things going on around you bro
You are just an idiot who thinks "everything is relative" is a clever point of view.
>>

 No.120494

File: 1627747192780.gif ( 681.29 KB , 1460x1080 , Today's furaffinity porn i….gif )

>>120458
If fucking femboys makes me a pedophile, I'll gladly adopt the label and go to prison.
>>

 No.120499

>>120494
penny poster you wouldn't last 5 minutes in prison. Do you have any idea what the nigs would do to your asshole?
>>

 No.120501

>>120494
>the avatarfag retard that likes children cartoons is also a pedophile
>>

 No.120502

>>120494
God please yes, and never come back.
>>

 No.120504

File: 1627747466818.png ( 474.5 KB , 444x663 , Somebody fetch me a better….png )

>>120494
You know if you're gonna impersonate me, make a little more effort
>>

 No.120505

>>120487
How about we think about how we do actually affects others? What someone jerks it to in their spare time, or even what kind of partners they are interested in, literally doesn't affect you.
>>

 No.120508

>>120499
have you seen this nigha? he is so fucking fat and disgusting he could just roll over on everyone who tries to beat him up
>>

 No.120510

>>120505
I dont want children or teenagers to be victimized even if it doesnt directly affect me.
>>

 No.120511

>>120510
What does that have to do with femboy admirers?
>>

 No.120512

>>120511
anything I don't like is pedophilia
>>

 No.120514

>>120508
>have you seen this nigha?
Nobi haven't. why has nobody posted his pic yet ffs
>>

 No.120518

>>120511
I already explained it, why are you playing stupid?

P.S. its not private if you shove it down everyones throat every chance you get
>>

 No.120523

>>120518
But your idea that people who like skinny hairless people want to actually fuck children has no proof. And I don't think femboy likers really shove their sexuality more than other people.
>>

 No.120525

File: 1627747966341.jpg ( 173.68 KB , 850x737 , sample_197dbad8f4b852bf9d4….jpg )

>>120514
you could prolly find it if you look in the archives
>>120518
shut up fag
>>

 No.120527

>>120525
>if you look in the archives
What archives? leftypol or bunkerchan?
>>

 No.120528

>>120523
There are a lot of skinny, hairless young men who arent on estrogen pills, dont use +12 body lotions to desperately fight aging, dont dress up in school uniforms and dont apply a ton of makeup.
Maybe you just have a different image in your head than I do, but dont tell me e.g. >>120482 isnt just shotacon.
>>

 No.120529

>>120528
Who cares even if it is a shotacon? It's literally a drawing uygha. It's fine, and I dare say even pretty common, for couples to have 'ageplay' fantasies.
>>

 No.120530

>>120529
You will say "its just a drawing I dont get hard at real children"
untill you do.
>>

 No.120531

The amount of seethe in this thread by retarded 16 year old/pol/tards is great
Remember you will never be a real man
>>

 No.120532

>>120530
>you won't do something bad…
>unless you do

Incredible and profound statement. I'm sure you also don't murder hookers… until you do.
>>

 No.120534

File: 1627748249171.jpg ( 142.94 KB , 1000x750 , pedosmuggie.jpg )

>>120529
Its not "just" a drawing.

>for couples to have 'ageplay' fantasies

No its not common.
>>

 No.120536

>>120534
There's a reason why the 'daddy' 'schoolgirl' 'mommy' etc tropes are so common
>>

 No.120538

>>120532
Are you a femoid? You don't decide what turns you on retard.
>>

 No.120540

>>120532
What a stupid strawman, if you constantly fantasize about murdering hookers and consume drawings depicting it you probably will eventually do it.
>>

 No.120541

>>120534
Who cares faggot it's not shotacon it's just homosexuality you shoud kill yourself right tf now
>>

 No.120542

>>120540
So should we lock up everyone who ever enjoyed a slasher movie then? Since they're obviously 2 seconds away from becoming a serial killer IRL.
>>

 No.120543

File: 1627748479134.jpg ( 125.23 KB , 593x593 , 1522430081609.jpg )

>>119752
>you'll never burry your meat inside astolfo's tender bussy
why even live?
>>

 No.120544

File: 1627748497834.jpg ( 7.11 KB , 199x253 , stopthefags.jpg )

>>120541
Whats the difference?(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
>>

 No.120545

>>120542
Nice strawman, just because you enjoy something in fiction doesn't mean you would actually do it.
>>

 No.120546

>>120541
If you think astfolo is not shota you are retarted and in denial. pedo
>>

 No.120547

>>120543
you can find a real trap gf/bf, I believe in you anon
>>

 No.120548

>>120545
Why would you fantasize about something you wouldnt like to do???
>>

 No.120550

File: 1627748565414.png ( 295.22 KB , 960x539 , thinking.png )

>>120545
>Nice strawman, just because you enjoy something in fiction doesn't mean you would actually do it.
>>

 No.120551

File: 1627748580433.png ( 27.01 KB , 530x579 , images.png )

>>120544
>Whats the difference?
Exposed as a poltard and so early in the thread too. What a shame
>>

 No.120552

>>120540
>[CITATION NEEDED]
>>

 No.120553

>>120542
Do you jerk of to slasher movies? God what a retarded pedo cope.
>>

 No.120554

>>120551
Doesnt mak you not a pedo for masturbating to a drawing of a child
>>

 No.120555

>>120550
uygha you gonna tell me ppl playing violent video games are killers too?
gtf outta here
>>

 No.120556

>>120553
So if the enjoyment is only psuedo-sexual (yeah I'm sure there's nothing Freudian behind enjoying the mutilation of fictional young nubile women for entertainment) then it's okay?

>>120555
I'm not the reactionary anon, I was just pointing out the irony of the statement
>>

 No.120557

>>120551
Archive. An idiot and a degenerate.
>>

 No.120558

File: 1627748733416-0.png ( 901.4 KB , 1242x718 , 1584734136543.png )

File: 1627748733416-1.png ( 38.55 KB , 436x70 , hoesmad.png )

mm yes another thread abt pedophilia just what we needed
>>

 No.120560

File: 1627748762381.jpg ( 128.77 KB , 850x1258 , jamad5893e77.jpg )

>>120546
>>120554
>>120557
>/POL/TARDS UNIRONICALLY WILL TELL YOU THIS IS A CHILD
>>

 No.120561

>>120555
Do you masturbate playing COD?
>>

 No.120562

>>120560
poltards jack to this.
>>

 No.120563

File: 1627748821665.jpg ( 5.29 KB , 128x128 , 1625457794934.jpg )

>>120561
>he doesnt masturbate playing cod
>>

 No.120565

>>120560
Its clearly a 13-15 year old child pedo
>>

 No.120566

>>120561
So jerking off is what makes something bad? That's the criteria?
>>

 No.120567

>>120565
it's a developed male body that has already been through puberty
cope and dilate
>>

 No.120568

>>120563
>he's a paedophile
>>

 No.120569

>>120566
Jerking of to children is bad, that's the criteria.
>>

 No.120570

File: 1627748949115.png ( 1.47 MB , 1920x1080 , Shiggy diggy doo, where ar….png )

>>120561
Are you telling me you dont? All my homies beat that meat and/or pussy whenever we play COD together
>>

 No.120571

File: 1627748975286.jpg ( 79.92 KB , 500x522 , 1426066060383.jpg )

>>120558
that wasnt what the threat was about, but here we are

>>120561
So it's only sexual activities that are emitated from media?
Why?
What's the difference?
Like is there some fucking essence in sexual positions that affects the viewer differently from a violent scene so he does one but not the other? Whats the actual argument here?
Obviously ppl are emotionally affected by all media, every impression has an effect, but why in the fuck is violence different from fucking?
Give me one materialist reason!
>>

 No.120572

>>120566
You are in denial.
>>

 No.120573

File: 1627749005960.jpg ( 73.66 KB , 1000x1300 , man.jpg )

>>120567
Here is a developed male body that has already been through puberty you fucking pedo.
>>

 No.120574

>>120571
The difference is that you're masturbating to children.
>>

 No.120575

File: 1627749059656.png ( 409.21 KB , 641x513 , 43c91c215219574ba013535471….png )

>>

 No.120576

>120536
They aren't that common and it's fucking creepy and degenerate. You get motherfuckers that put S&M shit in their twitter bios and they are fucking creepy and degenerate too. Even women that call their partner daddy, why would you want to fuck a guy that wants to fuck his daughter. Oh you want your husband to pretend rape you? What about when he does it for real? Bitch just find a bold and strong man that isn't rapey. Find a guy that wants to be a good dad and not molest your daughter. Fucking adults these days what the fuck are you all doing?
>>

 No.120577

File: 1627749090438.jpg ( 193.74 KB , 1440x2560 , 4769ac7.jpg )

>Here is a developed male body that has already been through puberty you fucking pedo.
>>

 No.120578

>>120575
>pedos in in denial will say this isnt a drawing of a child
>>

 No.120579

>>120573
>HE SHAVED HIS BODY HAIR THAT MEANS HE'S CLEARLY A 3 YEAR OLD CHILD
>>

 No.120580

>>120577
This doesnt look anything like the pedo drawing you post.
>>

 No.120581

>>120573
Yeah but what if he shaves his facial and body hair?
>>

 No.120582

>>120577
For someone accusing me of pedophilia you sure are full of actual CP in your computer huh bro
>>

 No.120583

File: 1627749163309.jpg ( 149.66 KB , 1071x1456 , 1615860294751.jpg )

>Here is a developed male body that has already been through puberty you fucking pedo
>>

 No.120584

File: 1627749173347.png ( 422.89 KB , 1200x800 , 29a6b535bd1c239d279986cfdf….png )

>>120574
>>120574
think is, i wouldnt even care if it were true.
like if i were a fucking pedo, I wouldnt have to live in denial bc im not a fucking moralist nerd
but whatever, idgaf about your spooked bs and astolfo aint a child, faggot
>>

 No.120585

>>120583
This doesnt look anything like the pedo drawings you post.
>>

 No.120586

>>120584
pedo in denial
>>

 No.120587

>>120586
i know you are but what am i
>>

 No.120588

>>120579
>>120581
Even waxxed he would look nothing like that pic.

>>120577
Thats not what a mans ass looks like and the faggot on the pic is most likely underage.
>>

 No.120589

File: 1627749247496.webm ( 1.92 MB , 656x1064 , 1624606940177.webm )

>Here is a developed male body that has already been through puberty you fucking pedo
>>

 No.120590

>>120584
>Stirner
Read a book, zoomer.
>>

 No.120591

>>120589
This doesnt look anything like the pedo drawings you post.
>>

 No.120592

>>120588
>Even waxxed he would look nothing like that pic
Really retard? See : >>120583 and compare it to : >>120560
>>

 No.120593

File: 1627749319082.jpg ( 121.95 KB , 602x2048 , 1619372473399.jpg )

>Here is a developed male body that has already been through puberty you fucking pedo
>>

 No.120594

>>120593
This doesnt look anything like the pedo drawings you post.
>>

 No.120595

File: 1627749365049.webm ( 3.03 MB , 720x1280 , 1621076409473-1.webm )

>oh noes, le ebil CP ;_;
>>

 No.120596

>>120592
Thats not what a man looks like you dumbass.
>>

 No.120597

>>120590
stfu nerd
>>

 No.120598

For doing it in private you sure do love posting underage dicks and ass all over the place.
>>

 No.120599

File: 1627749401429.jpg ( 641.65 KB , 1536x2048 , 1626985112630.jpg )

>Here is a developed male body that has already been through puberty you fucking pedo
>>

 No.120600

>>120595
This doesnt look anything like the pedo drawings you post btw .
>>

 No.120601

>>120599
This doesnt look anything like the pedo drawings you post.
>>

 No.120602

File: 1627749454231.jpeg ( 23.5 KB , 418x733 , you.jpeg )

>>120596
It's a literal picture of a real man. Kys right now
>>

 No.120603

File: 1627749458165.jpg ( 655.34 KB , 1539x2048 , 1618192166019.jpg )

>>120596
estrogen makes you look younger yeah pic relates is 30yo
>>

 No.120604

>>120602
Still doesnt look like the stfolo pedo frawings and you're ignoring it.
>>

 No.120605

>>120603
>>120602
Yeah sure doesnt look anything like a child lmao, coping pedos.
>>

 No.120606

>>120603
He does not look young, and not like the pedo shot pictures you posted before.
>>

 No.120607

File: 1627749548460.jpg ( 35.39 KB , 680x373 , stalinwriting.jpg )

>this thread
Archive. Idiots and degenerates.
>>

 No.120610

File: 1627749602271.jpg ( 1.52 MB , 2121x1592 , yiddies.jpg )

>>120601
saty mad
>>

 No.120611

File: 1627749610369.jpg ( 525.83 KB , 850x1319 , yoi0b5a886.jpg )

>>

 No.120612

File: 1627749620286.jpg ( 100.63 KB , 575x575 , 1617812561937.jpg )

>>

 No.120613

>Masturbate to pictures of children
>post pictures of not children that dont look like the drawings of children thinking you're proving something
Pedo brain demadge
>>

 No.120615

>>120571
>Obviously ppl are emotionally affected by all media, every impression has an effect, but why in the fuck is violence different from fucking?

Because Americans are still all puritans at heart and they view enjoying fictionalised sex as worse than fictionalised murder
>>

 No.120616

>>120611
Clearly a child
>>

 No.120618

>>120615
Enjoying pedo sex is bad. cope.
>>

 No.120619

>>120618
Why isn't enjoying fictional murder bad then. Seethe.
>>

 No.120620

>>120613
What are you on? All these 3dpd faggots itt look underage.
>>

 No.120621

File: 1627749722294.jpg ( 170.33 KB , 1422x1626 , 7c123ad688566e1317ac02b7ee….jpg )

>>120616
>Omg so true!!!
>>

 No.120623

>>120610
>>120612
You're not proving anything, nore helping your situation.
>>

 No.120624

File: 1627749759226-0.jpg ( 157.98 KB , 850x1295 , 1235841611.jpg )

File: 1627749759226-1.jpeg ( 132.1 KB , 907x1280 , 250520685.jpeg )

File: 1627749759226-2.jpeg ( 175.32 KB , 841x1400 , 857290964.jpeg )

File: 1627749759226-3.jpeg ( 103.34 KB , 717x1200 , 1149429414.jpeg )

>>120613
cry more, bitch
>>

 No.120625

>>120619
Are you openly admiting to be a peadophille that enjoys child rape? noted.
>>

 No.120626

>>120624
You are a peadophile.
>>

 No.120627

File: 1627749864587.jpg ( 87.88 KB , 1023x575 , gulagkids.jpg )

>>120624
Please follow these children ma´am, they will lead you to our new pedo camps.
>>

 No.120628

File: 1627749876835.png ( 595.02 KB , 671x950 , e98a30fd4359ccb5fa240f998e….png )

>THIS. IS. A. CHILD. YOU FUCKING PEDO!
>>

 No.120630

Shaving your body hair will be illegal.
>>

 No.120631

>>120625
I have enjoyed fictional shota/loli before, and so? Here I am, the big bad wolf, what will you do about it? Can you actually point to a child I harmed? No.
>>

 No.120632

>>120628
Correct.
>>

 No.120633

>>120628
Imagine because so brain dead you cant form any kind of argument and just resort to spamming porn, start cooming less and read a book.
>>

 No.120634

>>120631
You will harm children if you continue on this path.
>>

 No.120635

>most pedophiles are heterosexual men, stop covering for pedos faggot
Here is a source that shows that in a clinical sample straight non pedophile men actually have a slightly higher response to children than homosexual non pedophile men, however the straight men just had a higher response in general than the gay men:
https://psmag.com/social-justice/do-gay-men-have-more-sexual-interest-in-children-than-straight-men-do-62127
>>

 No.120636

File: 1627750001822.jpg ( 99.27 KB , 562x1000 , dde0fe196ab4d148c22898731a….jpg )

>>

 No.120637

>>120633
>>120632
You literally can't refute my point that image is not a child unless you're a projecting pedo yourself
>>

 No.120638

>>120634
Because why? I've somehow made it this long.
>>

 No.120640

>>120635
Yes, straight man want to rape girly boys too, thats why astfolo is popular. All straight man are child predators, this is correct.
>>

 No.120641

No gay man finds this pedo shit attractive.
>>

 No.120642

File: 1627750111837.jpg ( 95.57 KB , 850x670 , image0-3.jpg )

>>120637
>>120640
u mad bro XD?
>>

 No.120643

File: 1627750121283.gif ( 4.69 MB , 460x259 , questionmark guy.gif )

>>120640
So you're a radfem? Now it all makes sense
>>

 No.120644

>>120638
Beacouse you're a peadohile.
>>

 No.120645

File: 1627750152821-0.jpg ( 106.75 KB , 850x1202 , 1594447745336.jpg )

File: 1627750152821-1.jpg ( 16.48 KB , 400x267 , ast.jpg )

>>

 No.120646

>>120637
Thats not even the point you dumbass, they look like children and have childish bodies, now cope.
Funfact: pedos have on average a lower IQ too which really puts the spammers who cant follow a simple thread on a shitposting board into a new perspective.
>>

 No.120647

>>120644
>you are a pedophile
>why?
>because you are gonna hurt children
>why?
>because you are a pedophile
circular fucking logic
>>

 No.120648

>>120643
Why do you support straight man raping little boys in churches and schools, and claiming its the minority og gay man doing that?
>>

 No.120650

>>120644
I don't think of myself that way, not like I look for RL child porn, shota/lolis act completely different from actual children and the scenarios are all absurd and so on. If you want to think of me that way you can but I've never hurt a child and I never will. Your REEEEEEing has no purpose.
>>

 No.120651

>>120647
Youre a pedophile beacouse you masturbate to children.
>>

 No.120652

>>120648
What the fuck are you talking about?
>>

 No.120653

>>120647
>you masturbate to fictionalized children
>so?
>that means you are a pedophile
>so?
>that means you will hurt children
Thats the actual line of thought you disingenuous maggot.
>>

 No.120654

File: 1627750328419.jpeg ( 30.09 KB , 470x652 , you (1).jpeg )

>>120646
>THIS IS A CHILD BECAUSE…
>BECAUSE…
>IT JUST IS, OKAY?
>>

 No.120655

File: 1627750371720.png ( 176.79 KB , 540x432 , Uncomfortable and slightly….png )

You know I think at this point we need a containment thread for pedophilia discourse too. I'm sure most people are probably sick of threads turning into shitfests over what does and doesn't count as pedophilia, but we also cant deny people the ability to make breathtakingly intellectual takes. Better yet, put it in the same thread as the trans discourse for added laughs.
>>

 No.120656

>>120653
So if I like the Fast and Furious movies does that mean I'll cause death by dangerous driving?
>>

 No.120657

File: 1627750382851.png ( 3.22 MB , 2000x2829 , 1589741443549.png )

hoes mad
>>

 No.120658

>>120652
Majority of child abuse victims are male, but the abuse is done overwhelmingly by adult straight man. Yet /pol/fags ignore that and use the statistics against gay people.
>>

 No.120659

>>120654
Yeah because that face looks really mature and a child cant have muscles.
btw you didnt fap to this anyway ^^
>>

 No.120660

>120640
1. it's a clinical sample, many men were sex offenders or came to the clinic concerned about their sexuality
2. it was a small response, these men would still be considered to be exclusively attracted to adults
3.I would actually agree that many straight or gay male teliophiles (exclusively attracted to adults) are basically groomed and gaslighted into being attracted to pubescent children. Capitalism and the porn industry fuck up people's sexuality
>>

 No.120661

File: 1627750422833.jpg ( 43.03 KB , 600x615 , whatsgoing...aw lawd.jpg )

Did I just return to a thread full of screeching, seething, projecting, obsessed and ashamed closeted chomos trying to virtue signal the suspicion off their shoulders while accusing everyone else disagreeing with them of being chomos? I sure did!
>>

 No.120662

>>120656
Why do you resort to sill analogies to move the goal post?
>>

 No.120663

>>120658
>Majority of child abuse victims are male
Wrong
>but the abuse is done overwhelmingly by adult straight man
On girls
>>

 No.120664

>>120656
> watching a fun action movie, tottaly the same as masturbating to children being raped
Dishonest argument
>>

 No.120666

File: 1627750489788.jpg ( 55.18 KB , 576x768 , 129418902.jpg )

>>120646
Does this look like a child?
Cause this looks like astolfo.
And if they dont look like a child and they look like astolfo, astolfo doesnt look like a child.
Simple as.
You know not every otokonoko character is child-coded.
>>

 No.120667

>>120659
>Yeah because that face looks really mature
It's a cartoon face it's supposed to look that way.
>btw you didnt fap to this anyway ^^
Seethe cope and dilate
>>

 No.120669

What if the child consents though
>>

 No.120670

>120666 it does not look like astfolo.
>>

 No.120671

>>120666
Checked

YES THAT LOOKS LIKE A CHILD, AN UGLY ONE ON TOP OF THAT

>>120667
>hrrr its supposed to look like a child this means its not child like
Great point faggot
>>

 No.120672

>>120666
That is a literal child. MOOOOODS
>>

 No.120673

>120667
>Seethe cope and dilate
transhumanisters are far less likely to have sex with kids, testosterone seems to play a role in pedophilia
>>

 No.120674

>>120664
You can't rape a loli/shota since they don't actually exist, but even in the context of the fantasy, the kids usually are into it and enthusiastic partners
>>

 No.120675

File: 1627750571134-0.png ( 942.78 KB , 1307x1550 , 1615088900407.png )

File: 1627750571134-1.jpg ( 383.83 KB , 1648x1030 , 1616457052270.jpg )

>>

 No.120676

You "people" are subhumans
>>

 No.120677

>>120674
Yeah and then they abuse drugs and commit suicide because they loved it so much and hold those memories dead.
>>

 No.120678

>>120673
>transhumanisters are far less likely to have sex with kids,
And yet here you are projecting your transhumanist fetishes unto me
>>120671
Kys transhumanist children don't look like anime characters
>>

 No.120680

>>120674
They depict real children, dishonest pedo in denial.
>>

 No.120681

>>120677
Funnily enough that's not usually a part of loli/shota porn, maybe because it's an idealised fantasy yknow
>>

 No.120682

>>120673
I should say mtfs, but anyways most men still are not pedophiles
>>

 No.120683

File: 1627750683300.png ( 1.31 MB , 1200x799 , 1615133845894.png )

>>120676
stay mad
>>

 No.120686

>>120671
>YES THAT LOOKS LIKE A CHILD, AN UGLY ONE ON TOP OF THAT
ok i found your problem. you cant differentiate between children and adults, cause this is a 24 yo sex worker.
Maybe you just lack the social skills.
Maybe you are hyper-sensitive because of subconscious doubts about yourself.
But yeah thats not a child they are legal since 6 years famalan.
>>

 No.120687

File: 1627750798964.jpg ( 455.54 KB , 778x1000 , 1593926979152.jpg )

>>

 No.120688

>>120686
She is just projecting her pedo fetishes
>>

 No.120689

>>120686
>you cant differentiate between children and adults
much like a pedo cannot
>>

 No.120690

File: 1627750917943-0.jpg ( 65.79 KB , 652x1099 , 1625520390029.jpg )

File: 1627750917943-1.png ( 754.51 KB , 1280x1570 , 1537917256369.png )

>>

 No.120691

>>120689
But they can distinguish between fantasy and reality unlike some
>>

 No.120692

>>120686
A 24 year old "sex worker" who specifically cultivated a child like body to appeal to pedophile fucks like you.

Are you even able of any kind of critical thought? Or is just all a straight line through dopamine town?
>>

 No.120693

>>120692
t. pedo
>>

 No.120694

>120440
seethe lasaille
>>

 No.120695

>>120635
>>120673
I'm just gonna bump my own posts again to make that straiggot seethe some more
>>

 No.120696

>>120693
>calling me out for my paedophilic tendencies makes you a pedo actually.
>>

 No.120697

>>120693
Coping zoomer
>>

 No.120698

File: 1627751215940-0.webm ( 3.99 MB , 500x281 , 1565718627092.webm )

File: 1627751215940-1.jpg ( 94.44 KB , 960x679 , 1540534469071.jpg )

>>

 No.120699

>>120695
No gay man on earth likes astflolo.
>>

 No.120700

>>120692
REEEEEE stop liking what i dont like
>>

 No.120701

>>120696
>>120697
t. pedos who have to get outraged at everything other than pedophilia in order to cover their horniness for actual children
>>

 No.120702

>>120698
You're not proving anything acept thay you are a future child molester.
>>

 No.120703

>>120692
i dont think their body is child like as much as it is feminine. It's slick, not much hair, which of course is also used as signifiers for childhood, but also just a common western beauty standart for women. If they were child coded, they would put on more make-up to round up their facial features and also the quite grown up DICK would be tucked away or something.
I dont know again I just think you misinterpret female coding for child coding.
>>

 No.120704

>120699
yes true, the traps are gay shit is the stupidest shit ever because gays don't like traps, only straight dudes
>>

 No.120705

>>120701
pedo brain demadge
>>

 No.120706

>>120705
<brain demadge
>>

 No.120707

>>120703
She can't read more than 2 lines don't even bother
>>

 No.120708

>>120704
Yes, its for straight paedophiles, don't associate it with us.
>>

 No.120709

>>120703
Read the thread you ADHD zoomer.
>>

 No.120710

>>120702
>>120705
>>120708
the pedos are out on full force today I see
>>

 No.120711

>120708
cmon dude it's not pedophilia though, I'm bi and I'm attracted to literal traps/crossdressers but not children
>>

 No.120712

>>120709
i have literally been posting in it for like an hour.
can you make a point?
>>

 No.120713

>120712
I was gonna make fun of you but I agree with you and I do the exact same shit so I won't
>>

 No.120714

File: 1627751612121.webm ( 2.91 MB , 960x720 , em.webm )

>>

 No.120715

there is only like 2 or 3 pics (anime) in this entire thread that look somewhat pedoish
>>

 No.120716

You see from the discussion, what this character represents to most of us is femininity and for you for some fucking degenerate, psychotic reasons it represents children for you. I sure wonder which one is the pedo side
>>

 No.120717

File: 1627751682234.png ( 1.14 MB , 961x1441 , 17482395283954757.png )

>Jannies defending pedophiles by saging this thread
>>

 No.120718

File: 1627751685731.jpg ( 397.44 KB , 2203x1970 , IMG_20190101_115018.jpg )

>>

 No.120719

>>120715
Thats enough, the point is that none of them should be retard.
>>

 No.120720

>>120716
It represents a child beacouse it looks like a chilld pedo.
>>

 No.120722

>120719
you weren't just sperging at those pics now were you? Anyways the femboy whatever shit was unrelated
>>

 No.120723

>>120718
You're failed to proof anyhing with your porn spam coomer.
>>

 No.120725

File: 1627751783591-0.jpg ( 148.01 KB , 1153x1000 , 0ea8f98c196e476878d1864a57….jpg )

>>120720
stay mad
>>

 No.120727

>>120725
If you don't think this look like children you re mentaly ill
>>

 No.120728

File: 1627751837459-0.jpg ( 618.86 KB , 1000x1048 , 1504424939803.jpg )

File: 1627751837459-1.jpg ( 52.37 KB , 569x632 , 1555652033819.jpg )

>>

 No.120729

>>120720
To you, yes. You're literally looking at a frequently sexualized cartoon/drawing and think of children. Please seek chemical castration.
>>120724
<I look at adult pictures and children pop into my head! I'm not a pedo, you're a pedo!
>>

 No.120730

>120727
it looks like blended masculine and feminine adult features, stop covering for actual pedophiles by being retarded
>>

 No.120731

>>120727
get stomped on, pedo
>>

 No.120732

File: 1627751924814-0.jpg ( 300.82 KB , 850x637 , 1583830730817.jpg )

File: 1627751924814-1.jpg ( 359.85 KB , 1560x1300 , 1589932136864.jpg )

>>120727
seethe and cope
>>

 No.120734

>>120720
No.
Im also against pedo-shit, but not because I wanna enforce rigid rules that artists have to obey with no discretion, but because I don't want online spaces that normalise that shit and thusly cause harm.
Throwing the hammer at everything that just might be kinda childlike if you squind at it from the right angle serves nothing but fucking over artists.
>>

 No.120735

>>120724
>I have been making points this whole thread, all you did was post porn and make dismissive shitpost, faggot.
Cope or engage with ONE of the points from >>120703
>>

 No.120736

>saged
>unsaged
oh boy here we go again
>>

 No.120737

>120726
women don't look like anime in general/ If we are talking just neoteny than asian women tend to look younger than white women of the same age for instance, but adult asian women don't look like kids
>>

 No.120738

>>120400
>bourgeois pedophilic beauty standards
The bourgeoise are the ones that increased it to 18 from 12
>>

 No.120740

>120738
No lol it was people that didn't like child grooming and rape
Not every legal change is only desired by some monolithic ruling class, whos still molest kids anyways.
The bourgeois porn industry pushes pedophilia for instance
>>

 No.120741

>>120734
>no not the hecking "arterinos" we cant stop them from drawing porn for money and not contributing anything to society accept for more pedobait.
>>

 No.120746

>>120734
Based and sane take. ANTINA seal of approval
>>

 No.120747

>>120739
Now tell me: are the perverted sex freaks in the room with us right now?
>>

 No.120748

>120744
Are you lacking theory of mind or something? I am choosing not give you a (you)
>>

 No.120751

>>120749
burguasie sex culture apologist cant argue.
>>

 No.120752

File: 1627752539831.png ( 280.92 KB , 535x466 , 1614288398985.png )

>>120739
yeah, i read that
my first point was about the slick body not being child-coded because women shave too, and you said:
>Thats what women who dont take care of themselves look like and hairy armpits are gross, they stink and are full of accumulated sweat which specifically these "all natural" women dont get out with their flower oils.
So we agree here. tiny amounts of body hair are also typical for western beauty standarts.
my second point was about the face not having childlike make-up, which that post doesnt adress.
my third point was about them having a quite sizeable dick, which most children dont, and your post doesnt adress that either.
all you say is that you think anime-aesthetic (which would be otokonoko in this instance) is over-fetishised, which is like okay, but not what we were talking about.
am i missing something?
>>

 No.120756

File: 1627752643325.jpg ( 113.08 KB , 775x768 , femboy_hooters.jpg )

>gasps
Everyone, look! It's a child!
>>120749
Dunno what you're on about, but the paranoia is off the charts. I'm not pulling anything.
>>

 No.120759

>>120756
As usuall for retards you keep arguing against a point nobody made the entire thread.
>>

 No.120762

>>120759
No, you don't understand! Femboys are literally pedophilia! See that? No tits or manly features=literally a child!
>>

 No.120764

File: 1627752821216.jpg ( 125.02 KB , 1080x1497 , FB_IMG_1626898296802.jpg )

Bro check out picrel isnt he so youthful and child-like in appearance
>>

 No.120769

>>120762
Nobody has argued for that. Retard.
>>

 No.120770

>>120764
You're talking to yourself nobody, has argued against that.
>>

 No.120773

>>120769
>>120770
So not only are you pedos, you're also illiterate. The more you know
>>

 No.120774

File: 1627753132547.png ( 831.02 KB , 1033x750 , 1626924730164.png )

test
>>

 No.120775

>>120773
You are an idiot.
>>

 No.120777

File: 1627753201661-0.jpg ( 2.36 MB , 5472x7296 , 1626877082626.jpg )

File: 1627753201661-1.jpg ( 119.54 KB , 906x960 , 1626399323584.jpg )

>>

 No.120779

File: 1627753236664.jpg ( 56.97 KB , 497x549 , (((you))).jpg )

>>120775
>You are an idiot.
>>

 No.120782

File: 1627753326662.jpg ( 171.26 KB , 850x727 , sample_5426a3445252da8e6bf….jpg )

>>

 No.120783

>>120779
You show a lot of /pol/fag tendencies, so this is more likely projecting.
>>120777
Still doesnt look nothing like shota pictures, you have failed to proof any point, you are an idiot.
>>

 No.120786

>>120782
This is clearly a child, the caracter is canon 16 btw. He looks younger, the author admited multiple times that he's making pedobait.
>>

 No.120789

Keep going at it, fellas. More coom for me.
>>

 No.120790

>>120783
Well, this is a new one. Didn't expect the pedo to project even his own tendency to project onto me.
>>

 No.120792

File: 1627753471260.webm ( 666.36 KB , 720x1280 , 1627421307873.webm )

>>

 No.120794

>>120786
Who cares?
>>

 No.120799

>>120792
should have been in front of goldeneye
>>

 No.120801

File: 1627753562746-0.jpg ( 148.31 KB , 1280x905 , one.jpg )

File: 1627753562746-1.jpg ( 292 KB , 750x531 , two.jpg )

>>

 No.120802

>>120794
yeah no, >>120786 is right, dont lewd suicide boy you faggot
>>

 No.120803

File: 1627753591957.jpg ( 757.59 KB , 1308x1710 , 103639285289543654.jpg )

>this is a literal child kys pedo
>>

 No.120804

File: 1627753592371.png ( 541.52 KB , 894x919 , Angerjack.png )

>>120792
STOP POSTING CHILDREN YOU FUCKING PEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111111111
>>

 No.120805

>120794
pedoshit doesn't belong on leftypol
>>

 No.120807

>>120792
You're still not proving anything. Nobody argued that this man look like children.
>>

 No.120808

File: 1627753624664.jpg ( 37.81 KB , 480x678 , ventiii.jpg )

>>

 No.120810

>>120803
it's kinda cute how you put a hairtie around your ankle Shay
>>

 No.120811

File: 1627753671359.jpg ( 59.37 KB , 403x592 , 65b0aa601b9a3007a3e99bc11d….jpg )

>>120807
I dont care lmao
>>

 No.120813

>>120803
This doesnt look like shota drawings, you're not proving anything, and you jsut wanted an excuse to post yourself naked, attention seeker. In addition you do not look like a woman and never will.
>>

 No.120816

>>120808
This is clearly a child.
>>

 No.120817

File: 1627753717732.jpg ( 102.45 KB , 850x1046 , ventii.jpg )

>>

 No.120819

File: 1627753760653.jpg ( 138.79 KB , 1080x1350 , 1612661492474.jpg )

>>120815
>>120816
>>120813
are u le mad? are u le angery?
>>

 No.120821

File: 1627753803995.jpg ( 254.38 KB , 1000x1336 , i30ry6sx1j651.jpg )

>>

 No.120822

>>120815
>Its not just the hair, you post this desu anime things with this pale smooth skin and no kind of muscular pronunciation, thats not what a womans skin or even body looks like, its not "feminine" its child like.
>The make up is applied to make the eyes look bigger, the nose smaller, hide cheeks and the angle of the pictures hides the chin, again all childish features, not "feminine". Taking estrogen pills is not "feminine", holding your ass in the frame is not "feminine", its just fucking digusting and you are straight on a slippery slope towards pederasty and thats really the crux behind it all; yeah maybe today you jack it "feminine" 24 year olds today, but what about in 10 years? Or 20 or 30?? If you actually had contact with gays you would know there are tons of boomers running around with their zoomer fucktoys and its not like pedos are singularly obsessed with tiny children and wouldnt have sex with a 16, or 20 year old who can fulfill their fantasy at least a little.

>You are in fucking denial and I am done, you are not able to detect any kind of subtlety and resort to dismissive shitposts and porn spam, porn of questionably aged boys.

>120718 yeah thats totally a grown man bro, talking to you people is like talking to brick wall because you are in denial, calling everything "feminine" is just disingenuous to both me and yourself.
>>

 No.120823

>saged again
>>

 No.120824

File: 1627753872182.webm ( 1017.33 KB , 482x482 , 1559704533823.webm )

>>

 No.120825

>>120815
>hats not what a womans skin or even body looks like, its not "feminine" its child like.
does >>120666 ahve muscle pronounciation? again, they are 24.

>If you actually had contact with gays

I do have contact with gays. Contact of the sexual kind.

> I am done

yes you are, fuck off and stop projecting your bullshit on others and let ppl enjoy astolfo lewds ffs

>eah thats totally a grown man bro,

i didnt post that fam
>>

 No.120826

File: 1627753939396.jpg ( 43.87 KB , 1024x768 , 1572382830481m.jpg )

>>

 No.120830

File: 1627754020120.jpg ( 43.29 KB , 331x580 , IMG_20190522_165219.jpg )

>>

 No.120833

>>120825
You guys need to stop posting all this. It's making people get hard thinking about the children! Not poggers!
>>

 No.120838

>>120823
Now it's on top again and… saged again? Cmon housekeepers, make up your minds
>>

 No.120839

File: 1627754477053.jpeg ( 335.26 KB , 1803x2048 , EazhY7mVcAASlJq.jpeg )

>>

 No.120842

>>120825
>does >>120666 ahve muscle pronounciation? again, they are 24.
Yeah with the body of a child, are you really just incapable of thinking more nuanced than in a straight line or are you just pretending to be stupid?
>>

 No.120844

File: 1627755085663.png ( 139.98 KB , 782x758 , soycry.png )

>yes you are, fuck off and stop projecting your bullshit on others and let ppl enjoy astolfo lewds ffs
>>

 No.120846

>>120824
im not gay im not gay im not gay im not gay im not gay im not gay im not gay im not gay
>>

 No.120851

>>120842
>24
>body of a child
>what do you mean im a pedo youre a pedo
Into the woodchipper he goes
>>

 No.120853

File: 1627755801473.png ( 245.06 KB , 1024x1024 , abstract polface.png )

>>yes you are, fuck off and stop projecting your bullshit on others and let ppl enjoy astolfo lewds ffs
>>

 No.120856

Not gonna read the whole thread but is someone saying twinks with abs and beer-can cocks look like children?
only granny fuckers aren't pedos more news at 11 lol
>>

 No.120857

>unsaged again
>>

 No.120859

>>120851
Tell me with a straight face the dolls posted itt look anything like men.
>>120811 is ok I guess when you are a zoomer.

>>120856
Point me to the "twinks with abs and beer can cocks" itt please.
>>

 No.120860

File: 1627756317949.jpg ( 64.2 KB , 320x329 , 1620873534415.jpg )

>>120856
If you aren't exclusively attracted to this, you are a pedo.
>>

 No.120861

File: 1627756390346.png ( 1.17 MB , 1280x720 , not cool sonic.png )

>>120860
dude thats literally a child
>>

 No.120862

>>

 No.120865

>>120859
nobody looks like a man because what a man looks like is a social norm, therefore ideal and has no physical existence

i think they do, cute ones at that
>>

 No.120866

>>120862
Yes, we know you're a pedo. You don't need to tell us that by pointing out that reaction image
>>

 No.120869

File: 1627756574833.jpg ( 26.67 KB , 499x481 , pepeduh.jpg )

>>120865
Of course the pedo transhumanist spammer is an idealist.
>>

 No.120871

>>120866
I love when people get all uppity about shit on an anonymous imageboard, kek.
>>

 No.120872

>>120869
He literally pointed out 'looking like a man' is idealism
Please learn to read, kiddy diddler
>>

 No.120873

File: 1627756709029.png ( 557.29 KB , 1233x789 , 1627718945571.png )

>>120534
Lolicon isn't wrong.
>>

 No.120875

>>

 No.120876

>>120872
>looking like a man' is idealism
Thats the dumbest thing I ever heard.
>>

 No.120877

>>120873
Don't respond to this transhumanistу she's trying to derail
>>

 No.120878

>>120869
lol i literally made a materialist argument. can you read?
also, wtf transhumanism lol? i think you are mistking me for another anon
>>

 No.120880

>>120876
I suppose that could be the case, since you clearly cannot hear yourself talking
>>

 No.120883

File: 1627756946016.gif ( 1.55 MB , 371x209 , animeandmang.gif )

>>120875
>>120879
>no abs
>no big dicks
You are in denial bro.

>>120878
Yes I can read and your argument was stupid and not materialist at all.

>nobody looks like a man

>thats idealism
>I think they do
>that means I am a materialist
Good job dumbass.
>>

 No.120884

File: 1627756988489.jpg ( 188 KB , 800x1047 , 14872389409238423852.jpg )

>>120860
>>120861
>>120862
If you aren't exclusively attracted to this, you are a pedo.
>>

 No.120885

>>120884
Strawman
>>

 No.120886

>>120884
That's a child though, pedi
>>

 No.120887

>>120883
All the images have abs and dicks + some are irl photos. Stop projecting you fucking тranny
>>

 No.120889

>>120887
>If I repeat the lie often enough eventually they will believe it
>>

 No.120891

>>120883
nah idiot, nobody looks like a man was the argument and i think they do was not part of it anymore. it was my opinion. thats why i left space between the two things.
i found it basurd that you ask me if they look like man, which is ridiculous because what a man is is literally an ideal and therefore culturally and subjectively dependent. so that why i pointed out that a phyiscal maleness doesnt exist, it only exists through social sturctures that are informed by norms why are related to material conditions.
then i pointed out that to me they do.
so yeah, you really cant read apparently cause you literally didnt understand what i said, but >>120872 did so its on you
>>

 No.120892

File: 1627757328947.png ( 417.99 KB , 341x512 , ClipboardImage.png )

Homos, if you're not exclusively attracted to this you're a pedo
>>

 No.120893

File: 1627757341092.jpg ( 15.35 KB , 319x319 , really.jpg )

>>120891
>what a man is is literally an ideal and therefore culturally and subjectively dependent
Its Biology, there is nothing subjective about it.
>>

 No.120894

File: 1627757363265.jpg ( 16.12 KB , 398x279 , ok kid2.jpg )

>Yes I can read and your argument was stupid and not materialist at all.
>>

 No.120895

>>120892
>I just throw two extremes in the room and hopefully it will move the goal post
lol

>>120894
Is that your feminine boyfriend?
>>

 No.120896

File: 1627757409904.png ( 6.01 KB , 183x275 , brainlet waow.png )

>>120893
>Its Biology, there is nothing subjective about it.
>>

 No.120897

Traps, lolis, chestlets, big tits and embies are hot
Don't @ me
>>

 No.120898

File: 1627757460618.png ( 115.9 KB , 1000x432 , brainletbigboy.png )

>>120896
>shilling postmodernism
>>

 No.120899

>>120893
yeah, biology is a science and therefore a construct, so the different doctrinal notions of sciences are als subjective to their material situation
>>

 No.120900

>120877
>>120673
cissies dilate
>>

 No.120902

>>120895
Holy shit. You actually deserve to get raped and killed in an all-American rape cage, you fucking child molester.
>>

 No.120903

>>120892
That's clearly a child.
MODS DELETE THIS
>>

 No.120904

>>120899
It really isnt, men and women have different hormones as well as chromosomes so they develop differently. The "doctrinal notions" of science dont change this fact.

>>120902
Barking in the corner.
>>

 No.120907

>>120904
Go back to the feds with your pedo fantasies. You'll fit right in and they'll probably give you work too, meatsack.
>>

 No.120908

File: 1627757807796.mp4 ( 326.66 KB , 640x360 , rape.mp4 )

>>

 No.120911

>>120907
>lalalallalalala I cant hear you its not true its not true its not true its not true its not true its not true its not true its not true lallalallalalala
>>

 No.120914

File: 1627757995794.jpg ( 11.82 KB , 320x306 , kekkety.jpg )

>>120911
Stop quoting yourself.
>>

 No.120915

>>120914
>no u
The wit of a worm.
>>

 No.120916

>>120911
I say that all ths time
>>

 No.120917

>>120915
>The wit of a worm.
It does fit you better however, considering you refuse to accept that you're a potential childfucker who sees adults as children.
>>

 No.120918

>>120904
>It really isnt
Fam, do you think biology as a field was just discovered the way it exists now? The field was, in fact, DEVELOPED. Different people made different findings and then CONSTRUCTED a system out of them.
>muh hormones
Yes, that hormones exist in different numbers can not be disputed, it's a material fact. Very smart. But thats not the point. The point is what meaning we derrive from that fact. What does it mean to have 2 or one chromosomes of the x type. And the answer to this is, in fact, DEPENDENT on circumstances outside the scientific system itself, which means SUBJECTIVE.
Jesus christ you are a fucking retard.
>>

 No.120924

File: 1627758571788.png ( 350.46 KB , 568x590 , soy317.png )

>I am confident that most people who read this thread will see you as the bullshiter you are, trying to tell me the guys posted here look like adult men.
>You are a pseud who doesnt even understand the scientific method and its implications. Less Derrida, more Journals for you, pseudo intellectual mutt brain.
>btw you will never be a woman.
>>

 No.120925

>>120919
You literally are a pedophile if you look at pictures of adult men and start crying saying it's children.
Btw you were the one who clicked a thread you didn't like to parade as some sort of moral hero who totally hates pedophiles and isn't attracted to children. Go seek actual mental help
>>

 No.120926

>>120924
Great point zoomie.
>>

 No.120927

>>120919
>btw you will never be a woman.
well ok? yeah i dont care, im pretty comfortable being cis lol.

>Less Derrida, more Journals for you, pseudo intellectual mutt brain.

nice quib, but again you are not making a point so idc
>>

 No.120931

for once the fucking soyjacks are on the correct end of the argument. is this the end of the world or some shit?
>>

 No.120932

>>120925
and by mental help I mean a 12 gauge to the face, childfucker
>>

 No.120934

File: 1627758989124.png ( 33.87 KB , 1200x800 , are you soying what im soy….png )

>>120931
They were on our side the whole time anon
>>

 No.120938

>>120932
Yeah but I am the one who needs help, thats right fucktard.

>>120927
"everything is subjective bro" is not a point nor an argument, its ignorant.
>>

 No.120947

>>120938
>"everything is subjective bro" is not a point nor an argument
that wasnt my point uygha.
obviously knowledge can still exist even if we acknowledge that scientific systems are constructed and influenced by culture and productrive relations, the knowledge would just have a different quality. but this is beginners level modern epistemology, and if you are ignorant of it anyways why should i invest the energy to explain it to a total retard like you.
>>

 No.120957

>>120947
This is not coherent with what you posted previously and the scientific method entails quality control, macro level criticism of its entirety is not needed nor productive, you need to get out of your philosophy bubble.
>>

 No.120958

>120931
>as well as chromosomes so they develop differently
You are clearly ignorant on this issue. The only thing that sexual dimorphism is hormones. XY simply causes a fetus to develop testicles instead of ovaries, but this is dependent on androgen receptor sensitivity. There are women born with a vagina that are XY because they have an androgen insensitvity.
>>

 No.120959

>>120957
>This is not coherent with what you posted previously
it is, you are just too dumb
>>

 No.120960

File: 1627760573152.png ( 212.69 KB , 800x339 , ifls.png )

>This is not coherent with what you posted previously and the scientific method entails quality control, macro level criticism of its entirety is not needed nor productive, you need to get out of your philosophy bubble.
>>

 No.120965

so did the moral fags actually get yeeted by soijaks? Based
>>

 No.121068

File: 1627768929379.jpg ( 156.98 KB , 1456x1061 , 1627721597381.jpg )

The lolibros one this round
Holy based
>i-its just bad because its bad, ok?
>materialist btw
>>

 No.121069

>>121068
ok pedo
>>

 No.121081

>>120884
not exclusively, but yeah I'd fuck her
>>

 No.121124

>>121068
more english, less retardspeak
>>

 No.121161

File: 1627773695047.gif ( 595.71 KB , 240x160 , 1612895511273.gif )


Unique IPs: 45

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome