This make "read a book" fags malding.

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Email	68301
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Captcha Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

>>

Anonymous 2021-07-27 (Tue) 05:18:34 No.115827

File: 1627363113946.png ( 218.22 KB , 1920x1080 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

Anonymous 2021-07-27 (Tue) 05:31:56 No.115835

File: 1627363916230.mp4 ( 11.19 MB , 640x480 , Anons Discover a Book.mp4 )

>>

Anonymous 2021-07-27 (Tue) 07:22:45 No.115901

>>115812
You realize that quote is taken out of context?

>>

Anonymous 2021-07-27 (Tue) 07:33:24 No.115904

>>115901
I mean, it's pretty obvious.

>>

Anonymous 2021-07-27 (Tue) 07:42:29 No.115909

>>115901
do you have the full quote? thnx

>>

Anonymous 2021-07-27 (Tue) 08:24:13 No.115920

>>115904
>>115909
>CHAIRMAN MAO: Throughout history, very few of those who came first in the imperial examination have achieved great fame. The celebrated T’ang dynasty poets Li Po and Tu Fu were neither chin-shih nor han-lin.[21] Han Yü and Liu Tsungyilan[22] were only chin-shih of the second rank. Wang Shih-fu, Kuan Han-ch’ing,[23] Lo Kuan-chung,[24] P’u Sung-ling, Ts’ao Hsueh-ch’in were none of them chin-shih or han-lin. P’u Sung-ling was a hsiu-ts’ai who had received promotion, he wanted to rise to the next higher rank, but he was not a chü-jen.[25] None of those who became chin-shih or han-lin wore successful. Only two of the emperors of the Ming dynasty did well, T’ai-tsu and Ch’eng-tsu. One was illiterate, and the other only knew a few characters. Afterwards, in contrast, in the Chia-ch’ing reign, when the intellectuals had power, things were in a bad state, the country was in disorder.[26] Han Wu Ti and Li Hou-chu[27] were highly cultivated, and ruined the country. It is evident that to read too many books is harmful. Liu Hsui was an academician, whereas Liu Pang was a country bumpkin.[28]
I think Mao was criticizing the imperial education system and the disconnect between theory and practice, remember what he wrote on book worship. Also source: https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-9/mswv9_14.htm

>>

Anonymous 2021-07-27 (Tue) 08:26:10 No.115922

File: 1627374370898.png ( 5.01 KB , 397x75 , mao reads too much.png )

mao! mao! shit he can't hear us, he's wearing dengism!

>>

Anonymous 2021-07-27 (Tue) 08:43:19 No.115935

>>115812
What does /siberia/ think of this?

>>

Anonymous 2021-07-27 (Tue) 19:17:26 No.116464

File: 1627413446099.jpg ( 9.96 KB , 240x300 , Molotov.jpg )

I talked with Mao and then suggested to Stalin that he receive him. He was a clever man, a peasant leader, a kind of Chinese Pugachev. He was far from a Marxist, of course–he confessed to me that he had never read Marx’s Das Kapital.

Only heroes could read Das Kapital. When I was in Mongolia talking with the Chinese ambassador–he was nice to me–I said, “You want to create a metals industry quickly, but the measures you have planned–backyard blast furnaces–are improbable and won’t work.” I criticized the Chinese, and our people reproved me later. But it was such obvious stupidity!…Backyard blast furnaces to produce worthless metals–nonsense.”

>>

Anonymous 2021-07-27 (Tue) 20:18:19 No.116556

>>116464
Mao was a good revolutionary when it came to military strategy, just not a good statesman. Maoism is bad y'all.