[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/b/ - Siberia

"We need an imageboard of action to fight for OC making posters."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble


File: 1626990306758.gif ( 99.62 KB , 680x554 , this is YOU.gif )

 No.111002[Last 50 Posts]

Why are they obsessed with them? Why is the main concern of most right-wingers online people who inject themselves with hormones? The Nazi party wasn't obsessed with them, neither was fascist Italy. How did far-right politics fall to this level of stupidity?
>>

 No.111003

Because tr*nnies are the obsession of liberals and right-wingers obsessively hate whatever liberals obsessively love
>>

 No.111004

Probably because they’re disgusting abominations, being the pinnacle of bourgeois “culture”, so they’re easy targets. But it’s also projection, to distract from the fact that fags are part of the right
>>

 No.111005

File: 1626990597149.jpg ( Spoiler Image, 225.83 KB , 715x1265 , 1626832015654.jpg )

Because /pol/ is full of repressors
>>

 No.111006

Dunno, ask them. I asked them once but they just started spamming transhumanist wojaks and those butched medical procedures. Kinda weird
>>

 No.111007

That's because the Nazi party cross dressed in secret
>>

 No.111008

File: 1626991084692.png ( 10.67 KB , 183x276 , download.png )

*cracks knuckles*
*opens D:\Pics\transhumanists-memes, D:\Pics\transhumanists-operation-explicit, D:\Pics\transhumanists-ugly*
"You're gonna get it now!"
>>

 No.111009

Troons and polcels are equally ugly and sexless faggots. One side cares about each other way too much. Who fucking cares.
>>

 No.111010

everyone in this thread is a repressor who will end up transitioning in 1-2 years.
>>

 No.111011

>>111005
>not shays butthole
>>

 No.111012

File: 1626991858546.jpg ( 97.22 KB , 800x533 , GettyImages-1329728630-800….jpg )

I suspect they're projecting their own feeling of being emasculated onto trans people. If you grow up in a society that says to "be a man" is to be a self-reliant, successful businessman (the highest status thing there is to be) or an astronaut (or a businessman-astronaut), but you're a just total failure at all of those things, then you feel emasculated. Because it's YOUR fault you haven't lived up to this impossible standard.

They feel like their dicks have been chopped off, in a sense. It's not really their fault, of course, the system just destroys people on large scale. Their masculinity has been taken from them, and I can empathize with them in that sense, but trans people – who are often at the bottom of the social pecking order – are a visible enemy that right-wing media can focus them on hating.
>>

 No.111013

>>111010
Only if I keep languishing in this dry spell and then start doing hard drugs
>>

 No.111014

>>111002
According to Umberto Eco, one of the characteristics of ur-fascism (eternal fascism) is machismo and cultivated misogyny. This only works with a rigid gender hierarchy, so they will push back against it. It is the reason why Blaire White can never fully become a fascist, only a conservative.
>>

 No.111015

>>111002
>people who inject themselves with hormones
isn't it usually pills?
>>

 No.111016

>>111012
I think it is 100% the prevalence of trans and LGBT politics all over liberal media which is culturally dominant atm

I come to this conclusion from interacting with regular non-white conservatives/rightoids who are far less likely to take their views to the pathological extent that /pol/ users do
>>

 No.111017

Capitalist faux-diversity over-represents them in media, making them far more prevalent in the average human experience than in real life. It may feel to a foolish person as if they're taking over, leading to a hyperreal fixation.
>>

 No.111018

>>111005
NONONONONO I'M NOT GAY HALP ME
>>

 No.111019

>>111017
>Capitalist faux-diversity over-represents them in media
Most media representation of trans people is terrible tokenism at best. A lot of it, especially in so-called comedy, is outright reactionary.
>It may feel to a foolish person as if they're taking over, leading to a hyperreal fixation.
This phenomenon I recognize. This has resulted in large reactionary groups concluding that because they saw a trans person on TV (even if the trans person was portrayed in a negative way) that it must necessarily constitute "Cultural Marxism."
>>

 No.111020

I wonder about the class makeup of /pol/. The issues they talk about are so often issues which are completely superficial and divorced from the everyday reality of regular people.
>>

 No.111021

>>111017
Correct answer
Anything looking for some real deep analysis into right wing psychology or ideology is wrong
It is due to the sheer prevalence within media
>>

 No.111022

They're obsessed with all marginal groups that have no or borderline acceptance by the capitalist big other.
20 years ago they would have been ranting about "faggots n' queers". I mean they still do that a bit, but gay people are too well legitimized as a consumer demographic now.
>>

 No.111023

theyre gay nd dont want ""women"" in their bathroom only femboys :)
>>

 No.111024

Having a "reserve army of labor" is necessary in capitalism; i.e. a mass of unemployed people that not only serves as a discipling function for other workers but are also there to be mobilized during a really intense crisis. Marginalizing people based on social characteristics (race, gender, sexuality, gender identity, etc.) ensures that some people get forced into that reserve army.

Trans people have a harder time finding work. I'll see trans people sometimes working late-night shifts at gas stations and fast food restaurants and so on, low-paid work, filling a function but relatively "out of sight." Liberalism's "solution" to this problem meanwhile is a discourse around "rights" and faux-diversity "recognition" so you have a trans person on TV even if that fails to provide any real protections to trans people.

Fun fact: Cuba provides gender reassignment surgery for free and they try to run a full-employment economy. Apparently they have more of a "health" discourse and not a liberal "rights" discourse. I doubt it's a paradise, but it's a little different. Overall though, if liberal solutions fail, then we're only left with one option: communist struggle.
>>

 No.111025

>>111024
Or liberal solutions fail and they fucking kill us all with automated drones lmao
>>

 No.111026

>>111020
Children and teens of downwardly mobile middle class families.
It has to be right? Who else would freak out about a woman looked to manly in a video game?
>>

 No.111027

>>111024
trans people in Cuba are a public health issue, not an idpol issue.
>>

 No.111028

>>111019
>Most media representation of trans people is terrible tokenism at best. A lot of it, especially in so-called comedy, is outright reactionary.
Is this meant to be a rebuttal, or simple commentary? Because it don't matter to the hypothesis whether or not the exposure is positive or pro-trans. They're talked about more so you hear about them more and theyre on your mind more and they obsess about them more. Then a /pol/ user enters an echo-chamber where they see threads about them every day (including troll threads at their expense) which compounds the issue.

You can never see a trans person in your life and heart about them daily.
>>

 No.111029

File: 1626992852966.jpg ( 31.36 KB , 399x399 , 1619760780148.jpg )

>>111024
Trans people are the perfect capitalist subject. Work like a man, consume like a woman, forever fueling the idpol market cycle, medical dependency of a terminal patient.
>>

 No.111030

>>111028
>Is this meant to be a rebuttal, or simple commentary?
It is commentary. See >>111019
>This has resulted in large reactionary groups concluding that because they saw a trans person on TV (even if the trans person was portrayed in a negative way) that it must necessarily constitute "Cultural Marxism."

>You can never see a trans person in your life and heart about them daily.

I don't know from what background or age group you belong but I personally know multiple trans people and I live in a small town. Every trans person I have met, however, have all been zoomers. Zoomers are by far the most accepting, and this is saying a lot since they invented the so-called SuperStraight movement that pol latched onto.
>>

 No.111031

>>111029
The perfect capitalist subject are westernoids in general, tr*nnies aren’t anymore of a puppet than the average middle income westoid in general
>>

 No.111032

>>111029
>Trans people are the perfect capitalist subject.
Ideology is thinking you're not.
>>

 No.111033

>>111029
>Work like a man, consume like a woman
The distinction between feminine and masculine work has been greatly diminished ever since manufacturing jobs (which were traditionally male-dominated) disappeared. All that remains is largely service sector (nursing, clerks, waiters, etc).
>>

 No.111034

>>111033
Construction is still around
>>

 No.111035

>>111029
The worst part about your posts is the smug veneer of intellectualism covering your completely asinine ideas.
>>

 No.111036

>>111029
86 million amerimutts have diabetes. In a rigged market where an insulin pen costs $10,000
Now THAT is medical dependency.
>>

 No.111037

>>111032
Explain
>>111033
Men still have a biological advantage over women in most physical activities, currently mental too. However hormone therapy does harm both of these, it depends on where the trans movement goes, whether it is 'everyone can be anyone' and abandons hormones, or fully embracing robo-troon
>>

 No.111038

>>111029
It is easy to commodity any sort of identity. Being trans isn't the issue.
>>

 No.111039

File: 1626993262389.gif ( 489.42 KB , 297x200 , 79D24606-1E1A-4FAA-BD79-D7….gif )

>>111036
> 86 million amerimutts have diabetes.
Holy moly that’s a lot of burgers!
>>

 No.111040

>>111039
I feel bad for exaggerating the cost of insulin in America. There's enough bullshit on the internet.
The actual average cost is $200
>>

 No.111041

>>111037
>Men still have a biological advantage over women in most physical activities
I don't care if biological men are naturally predisposed to physical strength. Most men have not fully realized their potential and are quite average. The assumption behind such a statement is that every man is gigachad and every woman is smol bean when in reality there are a lot of average schlubs and a few people who buck the standard. I have to hear of a single instance where even in the construction industry bosses will go out of their way to find the most buff men. They don't care that deeply, even if they are ch*ds. Your post strikes me as being less than genuine.
>>

 No.111042

>>111036
>>111039
>86 million amerimutts have diabetes.
Not to be a party pooper but not according to the CDC
https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/library/features/diabetes-stat-report.html
<34.2 million Americans—just over 1 in 10—have diabetes.
<88 million American adults—approximately 1 in 3—have prediabetes.
>>

 No.111043

>>111036
Transgenderism is the perfect medical dependency. There is no achieving 'woman', it is a goal that can always be made a little closer. Also old people are leeches, ideally the ruling class wants to kill is off before we can become inefficient and retire.
>>111038
Well not really. You need to manufacture the idea that the commodity can complete your existence somehow. Fisherman is an identity but these dudes ain't ideal consumers
>>

 No.111044

>>111043
>the commodity can complete your existence somehow
So literally all lifestyle marketing ever then.
>>

 No.111045

>394936
Eh, too much internet has made me feel everything's an argument… I need a break.

>I don't know from what background or age group you belong but I personally know multiple trans people

Somewhat conservative liberal suburbia, but not like the south or anything. Unless people in other countries count, I haven't personally met anyone I know for a fact is trans. There might be one or two people but they may simply be very effeminate men or genderfluid. I don't ask and don't really care unless they wish to mention it.
>>

 No.111046

>>111043
>Also old people are leeches, ideally the ruling class wants to kill is off before we can become inefficient and retire.
And yet many private Capitalists make bank from nursing homes. Your argument assumes that the ruling class is a single ideological bloc and that their class interests overrule any distinctions between them. The ruling class acts according to material interests but is also motivated by other things.
>>

 No.111047

>>111043
> Transgenderism is the perfect medical dependency. There is no achieving 'woman', it is a goal that can always be made a little closer. Also old people are leeches, ideally the ruling class wants to kill is off before we can become inefficient and retire
I’d say this actually is a valid point, considering gender reassignment surgery and hormone therapy, as physically unneeded procedures conducted against a healthy body, basically do directly induce problems on their own that end up requiring life long medical assistance

Which is of course why I am personally not for it
Like, is it actually moral in accordance with the hippocratic oath to do procedures that are theoretically harmful since they are conducted against a body that does not need them?

And it also isn’t the same as, say, facial constructive surgery since that procedure is far less invasive and its affects are purely cosmetic
>>

 No.111048

>>111046
Also this
Lots of uyghas here will tell you to read Marx over and over again like it’s the Gospel and then start talking about “Porky” as if the capitalist class isn’t full of competing interests simply due to the nature of the system
>>

 No.111049

>>111041
It's about averages when we're talking about capitalism and political economy lad. Average trans person will be more efficienct than the average woman in many jobs.
>>111035
Come back with a le argumento
>>111044
You think all groups respond to this shit equally? Trans people will not only have shit they grew up with like video games but ideologically want things that sell the idea of 'women' on top of that, and will over compensate because of their dysphoria.
>>111046
I agree, it's not about these disparate groups, it's about looking at trends. You cannot do Marxist analysis on an individual level, it's about society. Old people, in general, are leeches because they don't offer labor power for surplus value to be extracted from. Throughout their lives they save, or have their kids labor power go towards their nursing homes, you've got the bourgeoise economics mindset. Who do you think pays for pensions?
>>

 No.111050

>>111046
>>111048
First of all you need to read Capital, before anything. Second of all when we talk about "porky" we aren't talking about the Illuminati sitting in a room trying to invent trans people. Capitalism was never schemed up, it 'appeared' so to speak, in the same way trans people did, in respondence to the material conditions of the time. This doesn't mean trans people are a bourgeois plot but it goes to explain just why trans people are so relevant and backed by the establishment. Zizek famously says that to convince the masses the ruling classes must fool themselves, I genuinely believe the vast majority of the bourgeoisie 'mean well' in this sense, they probably do support lgbt people on a (meaningless) personal level, this doesn't really impact the movement of Capital and how things develop in it however
>>

 No.111051

>>111050
> Second of all when we talk about "porky" we aren't talking about the Illuminati sitting in a room trying to invent trans people.
Except this is literally how you talk about “porky” all the fucking time
>>

 No.111052

File: 1626994473358.jpg ( 137.42 KB , 640x653 , ihatetrans.jpg )

>>

 No.111053

>>111051
You see leftypol, you see what happens when I care to explain concepts and meaning to these midwits?
>>

 No.111054

>>111049
>It's about averages when we're talking about capitalism and political economy lad. Average trans person will be more efficienct than the average woman in many jobs
You understand that there isn't one kind of trans, right? It isn't just MtF. And this "logic" already applied among non-trans people already, it's nonsensical.
>You think all groups respond to this shit equally? Trans people will not only have shit they grew up with like video games but ideologically want things that sell the idea of 'women' on top of that, and will over compensate because of their dysphoria.
I'm not even a fan of the gender essentialism that lies behind a lot of the rationalization of transgenderism, but this is bogus. People were already selling the idea of a certain gender essence far before trans people were accepted, and people of the sex which related to it were already overcompensating to try and aquire the archetype of the gender they wished to live up to. If you pay attention, it constantly happens today as well. Men try and aquire the archetypical commodity sold to them of what a "man" is, and so do woman. It's the same shit, it's just more on display with trans people because the sex doesn't obfuscate it.
>Old people, in general, are leeches because they don't offer labor power for surplus value to be extracted from. Throughout their lives they save, or have their kids labor power go towards their nursing homes, you've got the bourgeoise economics mindset. Who do you think pays for pensions?
Old people invest and spend their savings they've accumulated over the years, thus have a market of their own that the bourgeoisie cater to. You're not following through with this all the way. Old people are themselves consumers, and pensions are quickly becoming less of a thing altogether.
>>

 No.111055

>>111047
What a load of mutt moralizing. Trans hormone therapy is no different to pinning steroids.

Why would the medical establishment have amy say in this? Millions of people buy and pin cheap Chinese steroids, which is technically illegal largely thanks to moralizing faggots like you.
Please don't go into needs vs wants as that would be very un-Marxist.
>>

 No.111056

>>111049
>Average trans person will be more efficienct than the average woman in many jobs.
Please share with us these statistical average trans persons, then give us the statistics backing up the assertion that they are more efficient than the average woman. Please tell us, actually, what the average woman is. This is immensely tedious.

>>111049
>Old people, in general, are leeches because they don't offer labor power for surplus value
This assumes that all old people own their own home and have no debts. This is not necessarily the case. Many old people live in apartments, and thus their surplus value is still extracted. Many are still paying off school debts. If they do live in a home, they might not already own it, and may be paying mortage.

>>111048
>Lots of uyghas here will tell you to read Marx over and over again like it’s the Gospel and then start talking about “Porky” as if the capitalist class isn’t full of competing interests simply due to the nature of the system
This
A good example were the competing interests of the ruling class at the founding of the United States. The so-called federalists and jeffersonians emerged as opposing groups because although the ruling class had shared class interests, there were also different material conditions in the north (greater industrial output, agricultural production was more to do with whiskey production and food than anything else) and the south (primarily agrarian, cash crops like tobacco, indigo, cotton, even sugar cane in some areas, etc).

>Second of all when we talk about "porky" we aren't talking about the Illuminati sitting in a room

This is what you implied.
>>111051
>>111053
The fact that multiple people see this error of yours is indicative of something…
>>

 No.111057

>>111054
Mtf take up the vast majority of trans people and discourse.
>Capitalism sells gender shit
Yeah and trans people are the culmination of such trends to it's most efficient point. There is still a large culture of men not being soy-consumer types, as it gets worn down by all sides it only makes sense to market preexisting products (makeup for example) to these groups instead of inefficiently creating new products.
>Focusing on money and not labor power
Read capital dude trust me.
>>111056
Don't need to look at trans people just make biology. We stronger, bigger, more endurance etc, of course this doesn't lead to efficiency in every job but makes have higher efficiency potential if you will. You don't seem to understand surplus value, read some more Marx bruva.
>This is what you implied
Multiple people (2 lmao) pointed it out because it's a common misconception. Because it's common I took my time to write a post explaining what we mean when we say "porky" as Marxists, feel free to read it instead of repeating this again.
>>

 No.111058

>>111043
>Fisherman is an identity but these dudes ain't ideal consumers
Fishermen, farmers, hunters, etc., may not be cosmopolitan but this does not diminish their ability to consume, nor does it diminish the market for them. In truth, there are a lot of lifestyle oriented options for such people. Countless hunting stores, trader joes, bass pro shops, they even get their own kind of bars. You are myopic in your analysis. It is not about the sum total of consumer points. You keep talking about societal analysis and then make sweeping generalizations of people you are not qualified to discuss. We can plainly see you are a pseud.
>>

 No.111059

>>111053
>You see leftypol, you see what happens when I care to explain concepts and meaning to these midwits?
90% of your posts aren't doing this, the vast majority of the time it's you being a newfag who's only primary entry to communism was Zizek videos on YouTube, and then popped into the board one day so he could posture and say things that aren't as profound as he thinks they are. I don't even mind the idea that trans people consume to a good degree based on their perception of gender, my issue is that you always enter threads like you're the most intelligent faggot on the bloc saying something new and unheard of, and then give takes which have the most juvenile of "analysis" to them.
>>

 No.111060

>>111058
You gonna tell me fishermen consoom like urbanite troons?
>Nooo you can't make estimates based on obvious common knowledge
>>111059
Kek the projection, go back to Marx kiddo
>>

 No.111061

If we're being anal I never said 90% of my posts do explain concepts in a friendly manner. I'm literally talking about a single post and not only do I explain a concept I explain WHY I explained it. Yet you're a newfag who can't even understand my posts enough to create a coherent response so just cries and cries about posting styles
>>

 No.111062

>>111057
>Don't need to look at trans people just make biology. We stronger, bigger, more endurance etc, of course this doesn't lead to efficiency in every job but makes have higher efficiency potential if you will. You don't seem to understand surplus value, read some more Marx bruva.
By this logic, there would never be a woman in construction. I am cognizant of surplus value, it is you who myopically invoke Marxist terms and apply them incorrectly. By this logic of yours, only men would be hired for any type of job even retail, because of course men are biologically predisposed to greater strength, can carry more physical objects, do not have to deal with periods as a biological function, etc.

>>This is what you implied

>Multiple people (2 lmao) pointed it out because it's a common misconception.
Yet you said
>Also old people are leeches, ideally the ruling class wants to kill is off before we can become inefficient and retire.
This statement is absurd because it frames the ruling class as a single, cohesive bloc that necessarily shares the same agenda. Having the same general class interests does not inform a shared agenda. Regional differences inform a lot of this.

>You gonna tell me fishermen consoom like urbanite troons?

only troons consume? or is your assertion that troons consume more? It seems intuitively true that urbanites would consume more than non-urbanites, but the assumption here is that fishermen are not marketable, or are less marketable. All non-urbanites are less marketable. Again, another tedious argument.

>>111059
>>111061
Behold: the contrarian breaks under the sheer weight of his sweeping, unsubstantiated claims. So much of this thread has been ruined by armchair by your weightless assertions that trans people are uniquely instruments of capital. Replace trans people in your posts with black people and your arguments would still be plainly evident as reactionary. I wonder where in Das Kapital it says that people seeking to undergo gender transition are instruments of Capital. If anyone is a revisionist, it is you, the contrarian pseud.
>>

 No.111063

>>111037
>Explain
You have Zizek flag. Figure it out. His whole thing is how the ideology works by getting people to believe they're not buying into an ideology. If you think you're above this, you are eating from the trash can all the time.
>>

 No.111064

If you haven't noticed mostly white "people" are the ones who become troons. It's part of white "culture" to cross dress, meaning it's inherent to whites to need to cross dress. Other peoples do it too but it doesn't come as natural and gender dysphoria is more prevalent among the white "race". This is why the most self hating and most insecure and most highest numbers of this stuff are whites. This is why you see this "anti-troon" shit coming from them because it's just a part of being white to be a fetishist with no respect for anything.
>>

 No.111065

>>111064
>nonwhites dont become hijras or fa'afafine and thailand ladyboys dont exist
>>

 No.111066

>>111057
>Mtf take up the vast majority of trans people and discourse.
Yet they aren't the only ones.
>Yeah and trans people are the culmination of such trends to it's most efficient point. There is still a large culture of men not being soy-consumer types, as it gets worn down by all sides it only makes sense to market preexisting products (makeup for example) to these groups instead of inefficiently creating new products.
This doesn't read like an analysis, this reads like you rationalizing an already held position under the guise of Marxist analysis. How is are trans the culmination of gender trenda to their most efficient point? Your argument of efficiency doesn't match with your premise, as if it was actually an argument for efficiency in regards to the number of commodities, capitalists would just attempt to make products less gender orientated and just sell said products to both genders to aquire a larger average margin of profit.
>Read capital dude trust me
I have you pseud, obviously you haven't. Let me ask you this:
M'-C-M"
What does the M represent faggot? While we're at it, what is a form of value? What does surplus value facilitate which is then reinvested?
>We stronger, bigger, more endurance etc, of course this doesn't lead to efficiency in every job but makes have higher efficiency potential if you will. You don't seem to understand surplus value, read some more Marx bruva.
Seriously, why are you so fucking stupid? This isn't what surplus value relates to, surplus value has to deal with labour done beyond what is necessary to reproduce the worker and society, and is largely a metirc of just time itself as it assumes socially necessary labour time as being value itself. The strength of the workers isn't a primary or relevant factor, and Marx already assumes the average labour being done is at average intensity. All that matters is a commodity is being produced and sold (therefore fufilling having use value). A worker could work harder to produce more commodities, but this is not what primarily allows for the extraction of greater amounts of surplus. Greater amounts of surplus can be extracted relatively or absolutely, with absolute surplus value being an increase in the work day and relative surplus value being an increase in production by means of introducing more efficient production methods (which largely has little to do strength and more to do with the actual movement of production and the implementation of new technologies), or lowering wages.
>>

 No.111067

uygha you're too retarded, I've explained literally all your problems already, come back when you're not a brainlet.
>Why don't all men get hired???? Checkmate!
Kek didn't we finish with this pseud shit in like 2012 atheist YouTube?
I would like to just focus on this as my main point against all you brainlets: So here's how the thread goes
>Porky…
<DUUUUHHH I'm a retard and have been a commie for half a week, you mean illuminati??
>No, actually, what we mean when we say porky is…
<DUHHH BLVLBLBBL asschtually you said here 'porky' so your clarification of what porky means is invalid
How do you dudes make it through each day without lobotomizing yourselves?!
>>111063
I'm still unaware of your point.
>Muh trashcan
Read zizek fren
>>

 No.111068

>>111067
NTA, but you don't even understand what surplus value is, and tried to discard money as not being of primary focus in Marx's works, despite it literally being critical towards understanding. The money form of value is integral to capitalism, what the actual fuck are you talking about here >>111057?
>>

 No.111069

>>111067
>I'm still unaware of your point.
No one is "anti-capitalist" if you've been raised in it from birth, you idiot. You can say "read Marx" and "read Zizek" but it's not going to convince anyone here when you get confused by commodity fetishism and Zizekian ideas about how ideology functions in the modern age.
>>

 No.111070

>>111067
Bruh
Like, will you fuck off dude
You’re a fucking moron
First off you haven’t been talking to me for the most part, you fucking meme flag baboon
Secondly I don’t give a fuck what you think you mean when you say “porky” because all that matters is the way you actually use it which is in fact to talk about the capitalist class as a single entity all coordinating their plans together

I don’t need to read Capital for the second fucking time and take another class on it to see that you are a fucking moron, and being a little arrogant cunt about your own stupidity doesn’t take away from that fact
Other than an admittedly based take on Der Troon you have utterly dogshit takes otherwise

It’s one thing to be a moron, it’s another thing to be a fucking conceited and unlikeable moron
>>

 No.111071

>>111065
>Acting like lady boys in Thailand aren't just a fetish signal boosted by whites looking to get pegged in a foreign country

I'm willing to bet that Thailand's "famous lady boys" wasn't popularized until white sexpats looking for it.
>>

 No.111078

>>111068
I'm talking about boomers being dead weight. Then some retard like 'b-b-but retirement homes expensive'. Read Marx.
>>111069
Okay you have no point, and/or don't understand these topics well enough to articulate them yourself
>Ur Confused by 'muh trashcan' !
uygha please read Zizek you have literally no idea how little you know
>>111070
>Still bitching about shit I've clarified a million times already
>No argument, crying because I BTFO him
>He took a class on capital
LMAO this uygha
>>

 No.111079

>>111071
Buck Breaking was a joke documentary, not something you should take seriously.
>>

 No.111083

>>111080
Read my posts transhumanist and you'll understand
>>

 No.111086

>>111079
This didn't have to do with the buck breaking thing but I think this proves my point even better since white "people" literally have higher amounts of the gay gene which makes them susceptible to homosexuality and sex change gender dysphoria. Nazis in Germany had many homosexuals, formally illegal, but openly sodomy was accepted.
>>

 No.111170

>>111080
Nazis had the highest amount of trans and homosexuality, openly. It was made illegal through law but many secret police in Germany engaged in cross dressing and sodomy both forced and unforced. Most Germans performed forced sodomy on Jews since "technically" speaking it was illegal to sodomize other Germans but Germans regularly partake in sodomy of children and men.
>>

 No.111178

>>111078
>I'm talking about boomers being dead weight. Then some retard like 'b-b-but retirement homes expensive'. Read Marx
Maybe you should read Marx, because nowhere in Marx are boomers inherently dead weight. If they operate as consumers, they feed into a given market. If they feed intoa given market, they aren't "dead weight" until they can't do so. You're blatantly incorrect regarding money in capitalism, and are incorrect to a larger degree in you conception of surplus value. You obviously haven't read Marx, because you wouldn't say stupid shit like this if had.
>>111080
>When National Geographic magazine devotes a 100 page issue to the merits of kids (read males) becoming trans, you can't pretend that this isn't being pushed by globohomo. Billion dollar companies are promoting trans. Why? In the USA its estimated that 0.6% of the population identifies as trans. It doesn't make sense for them to cater to a statistically insignificant population with the sheer glut of promotion they receive, unless it's somehow tied in with government objectives, i.e. the woke bullshit that the CIA promotes
I don't think you get it then. It's not selling to trans people, which is what that other poster doesn't get either. It's about creating a brand which appears to be wholly accepting and thus "human" by presenting themselves as being cognizant of certain social issues, which for capitalists just means pursuing paying lip service to the smallest of minorites, thus showing the extent of their "outlook". Some minorites are genuinely a growing market demographic, like blacks recently in the west due to families developing established income and being vocal in their tastes, but for smaller minorites with little market demographic it's simply for presentation. Capitalists will scrape the bottom of the barrel for profit the more the rate of profit declines, and sometimes that means capitalizing on a certain demographic to get other people outside of it inclined to pay to seem "moral" themselves. Or in other words, to buy into being an increasingly "good" person, particularly when its made convenient and "in vouge".
>>

 No.111183

File: 1626998912973-0.jpg ( 231.48 KB , 1000x1600 , Screenshot 2021-07-09 1833….jpg )

File: 1626998912973-1.jpg ( 187.59 KB , 1000x1416 , thankgod (2) (1).jpg )

>>111002
>>394813
Full discloser, I am myself a National Socialist, and while the simple (and suprisingly necessary) answer is
>"We Aren't"
In the spirit of Intellectual honesty I thought I might offer to shed some light as to why it apparently SEEMS as such to any who give a shit enough to ask the question
(Which if you dont, kinda begs the fucking question why you made/posted in this fairly meme teir thread but i digress)
The SIMPLE answer to this itself is that its being crammed down everyone's throats right now.
The Left (broadly defined here as all ideologies which accept the enlightenment era view of man) is pushing for the specific normalization of transgenderism currently.
Its similar to how you heard more out of the right about homosexuals when gay marriage was pushed for
Or when you heard more out of the right about race science when inneracial marriage was pushed for
And why you'll hear more out of the right on the given subjects when you inevitably push for beastiality or pedophilia or the mass sterilization of humanity to stop climate change. (Or whatever other deranged, cancerous, suicidal bullshit the propaganda outlets run by multi-billion dollar corporations abitrarily decide to indoctrinate you to support as their jewish owners go insane on the excess plenty provided what has been until recently an essentially planatory monopoly on resources)
Right-Wing Politics in the Liberal west are largely speaking "reactionary" as society is controlled by a culturally Marxist olarchy (and yes i have READ Marcuse) and as such it mainly takes the form of the base instincts of people naturally reacting to things which are obviously against the evolutionary interests of their species and genes unmoored from any over arching ideology as all such ideology is ruthlessly censored and supressed in a way Marxist and other supposed "revolutionary" leftist ideologies never are
(Noam Chomsky and Zizek get invited to speak at the centers of american wealth and power, Jared Taylor gets his fucking youtube channel taken down)
This by the way is not in an attempt to convince anyone of anything
I am well aware that allmost all if not all of you are utterly unthinking cattle who will not consider anything written here and are probably already typing out the aweinspiringly ironic self burn of rejoicing in your own low attention span typing
>"TL;DR"
This i am well aware of from numerous experiences with such "intellectual revolutionaries" as gather hear
Rather it is for my own sake and my own principles that i speak as well as i can on the off and extremly slim chance that there is anyone hear capable of questioning anything they believe to any extent what so ever
Or for that matter?
Even being consious enough to comprehend written speech dictated by one they have not been indoctrinated to reveer.
>>

 No.111188

>>111183
epifaggot
>>

 No.111192

>nowhere in Marx are boomers inherently dead weight
I-i don't even know what to say… You're possibly the most brain-dead poster I've ever engaged with. Do you seriously think I'm trying to quote Marx verbatim in every point I make? Use your tiny fucking brain and realise boomers are dead weight in Marxist economics. You don't need Marx to literally say those words, you can do it!
>You're incorrect about money in capitalism
What the fuck are you saying???????? I've made almost no claims about this. It's very very simple.
>LTV
>Old uyghas don't labor
>No surplus extracted
>Indirect Leeching (pensions)
>Direct leeching (just getting their kids to pay for them)
>Old people don't consume shit
>They do introduce some money back into society but this is nothing compared to their would-be labor power
All this means my point: old people suck ass for cappies, trans people are based for porky (oh no don't get triggered, I used the P word!) since they likely die before they retire. Feel free to explain where you have a problem with this.
>>

 No.111198

>>111191
Sounds like you're coping that your people were openly sodomites and gender dysphoric psychopaths that were left alone to run a country and lead to insane crap and degenerate contradictory laws. So much so that your disgusting culture has infected all of modern society. It was clear that we didn't kill enough Nazis, in fact we coddled some of those sodomites into police positions after the war. Sodomites with real track records of raping boys, which makes sense why the rape rate was so high in West Germany and west Berlin alike. And with Nazis working in our scientific institutions the old left in the west was left to rot with Nazi sodomite, troon identitarian garbage.
>>

 No.111200

>>111196
It's a dialectical relationship. Trans people feed off Capital and Capital feeds of trans shit.
>>

 No.111235

File: 1627002228167.png ( 170.21 KB , 444x364 , When the overdose doesn't ….png )

Oh boy, another trans discourse thread! I bet this will contain lots of nuanced observations and wont at all be filled with transphobic bait and shit takes! Not in the slightest!
>>

 No.111236

>>111003
FPBP
>>111017
This as well
>>111026
>Who else would freak out about a woman looked to manly in a video game?
Same people who freak out about a woman looking too feminine in a video game: terminally online culture warriors and their grifter elites. NEETs have to be included.

>>111029
You have consistently been the both the most condescending and least insightful poster on this board, worst than even socdem flag anon. Read a fucking book please, or at least have the decency to use a tripcode so that I can filter you.
>>111078
>uygha please read Zizek
Reminder to everyone here: this is most likely the same Zizek flag anon who used Zizek's critique of alienation to argue for ethnostates.
>>111053
>muh midwits
Pure projection.
>>

 No.111238

>>111183
There is no actual analysis here, it's all just unfounded speculation and allegation with zero basis to it. It's one big emotional diatribe with nothing to it, and attempts to argue around having to actually argue against Marxism itself (which of you're the anon in past threads in the past, you are never able to make empirically).
>>111196
>They aren't using trans people to sell their brand, they're using their brand to sell transgenderism.
Anti-materialist nonsense.
>>

 No.111240

>>111235
Shut the fuck up PtF (peanut to fairy)
>>

 No.111264

>>111238
>attempts to argue around having to actually argue against Marxism itself (which of you're the anon in past threads in the past, you are never able to make empirically).
Anon for 1
I wasn't attempting to argue against Marxism in the given post,
I was responding to a god damn question
You ask someone what 12/4 is they'll give you the answer, not the mathmatical proof for multiplication
Secondly,
What the fuck exactly do you WANT proof wise to debunk Marxism emperically?
The LTV is Bullshit
The Model of Class is Bullshit
And the Model of history/society predicated upon that bullshit understanding of class is also bullshit
All of this has been explained to DEATH in multiple threads (as you well now if you have read any) with the only responses being half hearted half admissions and screaming into the fucking wind
I have explained these points
ADNOSIOM
And WILL likely do so again in other threads here
But if you expect me to reargue every point of my worldview/argument every time i answer a fucking question then you're retarded
If you're curious about something?
Feel free to ask
i'll be happy to explain
But dont bitch at me for not answering a question NOT asked in the OP
>>

 No.111268

>>111264
cringe
>>

 No.111275

>>111192
>I-i don't even know what to say… You're possibly the most brain-dead poster I've ever engaged with. Do you seriously think I'm trying to quote Marx verbatim in every point I make? Use your tiny fucking brain and realise boomers are dead weight in Marxist economics. You don't need Marx to literally say those words, you can do it!
No, they literally aren't. Nothing from Marx follows that Boomers are dead weight, so long as they feed into the system itself. That's literally all that matters. Actual "dead weight" would be those that only take from capitalist production, but never invest, either directly or indirectly, into it.
>What the fuck are you saying???????? I've made almost no claims about this. It's very very simple.
You literal response was:
<Focusing on money and not labor power
This is a nosense statement to make. As boomers providing labour power is meaningless as long as they purchase commodities, because the capitalist itself is already obtaining surplus with his stocked resources of labour power.
>LTV
>Old uyghas don't labor
>No surplus extracted
>Indirect Leeching (pensions)
>Direct leeching (just getting their kids to pay for them)
>Old people don't consume shit
>They do introduce some money back into society but this is nothing compared to their would-be labor power
This is already incorrect, because old people do consume shit. It's literally a multi billion dollar industry, especially when you factor in healthcare. The capitalist doesn't need everyone labouring, he doesn't get more from boomers if production is already stocked with workers up to its profitable limit, and boomers have already expended their working life more of less, with production needing new blood to infuse it. Boomers leaching on their children is also of no concern for them, because thats merely a cost on the prole, not them. And pensions are disappearing over time, and are largely seen only in public positions nowadays. Your point on surplus labour is so absurdly stupid, I don't get how you can possibly claim to have read Marx. People aren't surplus value batteries, with capitalists trying to get the most people to work at a time to get the most surplus value. Thats not how surplus value works at all. Rather people facilitate the creation of surplus value through the means of production, with workers utilized only so much as they are necessary to do so profitably. Increasing the amount of workers arbitrarily does not inherently increase the total surplus produced that is realized as profits.
>>

 No.111279

>>111277
>Wikipedia source lmao
>>

 No.111297

>>111264
Anon, you've been refuted in all of those threads, screaming that it didn't happen and that everyone actually conceded to you is cope. The LTV is empirically verifiable and testable, thought that may be hard for someone like you who rejects empirics in his arguments and emperical methods, instead trying to subvert the whole thing with unfounded rationalism. Here's a video of the empirics if you want, though like most times it's been posted, I doubt you'll watch it.

And before you ask, I'm not here to debate again. Every point you've made is a point I've refuted twice over, and I have the archives to show for it. I don't need to argue anymore with a person too deluded and self-absorbed with his own narcissism that he blinds himself to the truth in his cyclical shouting. Every time, it's just you coming back to repeat previously addressed points, in the hope no one gives you the answers that crippled you, so you can pass it off as a "win" in your twitter poisoned mind. I have the receipts, and you have no more allegation to make that the anons on this board never addressed you fully. I'm going to actually try and have discussions with anons willing to learn, and speak to those who will hear the truth. You can go back to your decaying trash heap where you try to convince those you see as degenerates that they aren't following your tenets properly, of the proper "theory" of "national socialism" that no one wants to hear because they're too busy spamming wojaks and memes of having sex with black men. Fix your own house before coming here, you'll probably do more then the dick stroking you do to pleasure yourself. I'm going to go see if I can bring more anons towards socialism in the time it took me to bother debating you, because at least that will be constructive, as opposed to speaking to an anon who's standing in a hole as the storm gets worse, and demands others stand in the hole and await the rain to drown them both.

Take care anon.
>>

 No.111303

>>111297
I want the archives, they are like crack to me
>>

 No.111306

File: 1627006062102.jpg ( 60.99 KB , 782x684 , feelssogoodtobebaddifferen….jpg )

>>111297
Anon whether you want to "debate" (by which of course you mean post links to old threads that ended with mods archiving before i could respond to long form discussion questions) is irrelevant
You aren't my fucking white wale or whatever the fuck that i intend to spear with the harboon of "facts" and "reason" allah ben shapiro.
I know that i am right.
Just as all of humanity before me was right.
And just as all the pre-rational organisms whos actions were determined by chemical process were equally right.
I frankly find it funny as all shit that a man who's unironic position is that what every living organism on earth does doesn't have any relation to fucking speak of to what they
>"should"
do when compared to the personal evaluations of his own ego is calling OTHERS
>"narcacists"
But you are after all a Leftist and it would be foolish of me to expect better.
If you wish to ever talk about any of this again i will be more then happy as that is a moral duty which i KNOW is incumbant upon me.
But i equally dont give a shit if you are
>"Tired"
or whatever the fuck of defending your positions.
Just as i dont give a shit what psuedo intellectual richardo teir mental gynmastics Victor wants to do in order to explain away data which disproves his economic theory.
>>

 No.111308

>>111303
she comes to shit here every now and then, always the same arguments
some incel shit about prostitutes disproving the LTV
>>

 No.111309

>>111306
And yet you come back. It really is just narcissism, innit?
>>

 No.111310

>>111308
I know, gimme the damn archives.
>>

 No.111312

>>111310
sorry I don't personally archive random nazi shitposts
>>

 No.111314

>>111308
she???
>>

 No.111317

>>111306
>That meme
In my entire time studying political science in university I never once saw any sort of large-scale faculty led discussion, meeting, or club about socialism/communism
In fact on my massive public campus the only socialist group that existed was the one I helped create which had less than ten people in it
>>

 No.111318

File: 1627006794447.jpg ( 168.44 KB , 1500x1500 , freethoughtrightvsleftmeme….jpg )

>>111309
>>111309
If it were i wouldn't be selling the single most hated ideology in the modern political overton my dude.
Plenty of easy ways to get called "smart" and "based" selling popular talking takes if you need some high off validation.
My time on hear is usually spent getting called a retard by people who have unironically read less theory then me.
>>111314
OWO
How'd you guess anon~~~

(lol, legit tho i'm guessing thats a typo, otherwise i to am kinda fuckin curious what gave off the vibe lol)
>>

 No.111319

File: 1627006866391.jpg ( 272.3 KB , 1005x2000 , What German Women Want.JPG )

>>111318
Does this turn you on?
>>

 No.111323

File: 1627007093800.jpg ( 99.93 KB , 1200x1004 , paperspleasetrannymeme (1).jpg )

>>111317
Yeah anon and if you tried to make a club with politics that actually threatened the status quo you would have been kicked off campus as every white student union and israel boycott group can fucking tell you.
Post all you want all day every day about how you want to abolish the market system, wage labor, and private property
MENTION 13 is 50 or Jewish power??
You get the boot immidiately.
That SHOULD tell you something about the manner the powerful view themselves in the modern state.
At least,
It would if you were actually examining the relations of the contending classes on a material basis…
>>

 No.111324

>>111318
>otherwise i to am kinda fuckin curious what gave off the vibe lol
your BPD
>>

 No.111327

File: 1627007195266.jpg ( 97.37 KB , 1000x1019 , Screenshot 2021-07-03 0125….jpg )

>>111319
Nah but it is kinda funny tho to think jews have been pushing this shit for so long with similarly shit results
Its like feminists tyring to get men to stop looking at the boobs of women with bigger tits then them.
>>

 No.111328

>>111319
If i remember correctly, she posted interracial loli so yeah she's probably turned on by that.
>>

 No.111330

File: 1627007265434.jpg ( 23.86 KB , 573x331 , Screenshot 2021-06-06 1827….jpg )

>>111324
THE FUCK YOU SAY TO ME YOU LITTLE BITCH!!!!
>>

 No.111331

>>111323
>He doesn’t know I was also involved with the pro-palestinain group on campus
<He thinks we told the campus we were communists
Anon we weren’t even sponsored by a professor and only had a single room on the campus once a week for about a month
>>

 No.111332

>>111326
This was after the defeat of nazi germany in a contemporary article.
>>

 No.111333

>>111323
And how the fuck does gurgling honkie jizz threaten the status quo you cousin fucking faggot?
>>

 No.111334

>>111323
>Guys, the ideology that gets kicked is always the correct one!
>Support the child abducting dog rapists to act as your government now!
This kind of logic will never not be funny.
>>

 No.111335

File: 1627007538361.png ( 1.22 MB , 2500x1921 , Shay’s Topkek.PNG )

>>111328
Every time
>>

 No.111337

File: 1627007871001.jpg ( 185.31 KB , 1500x1500 , freethoughtrightvsleftmeme….jpg )

>>111331
>He doesn’t know I was also involved with the pro-palestinain group on campus
Well anon congrats on briefly yet seriously opposing the tribe who wants you dead due to your fucking skin color
Even if it was on the basis of simping for shitskins who probably also want you fucking dead
Still?
Better then most i will grant you that
>Anon we weren’t even sponsored by a professor and only had a single room on the campus once a week for about a month
Anon call me when a single person finding out you hold the ideology you do will get you banned from ALL job entries and uneverities the nation over.
Then come talk to me about how fucking "revolutionary" you are
>>111333
If you're not a fucking "honkie" i wouldn't expect you to understand as you are also opposed to them by virtue of your genetics and evolutionary function
But if you ARE a "honkie" then the fact that you dont get it is unto itself demonstration that you are probably beyond reaching.
(especially given you didnt even stop to think why it MIGHT be the case before asking showing a lack of internal diaologue)
>>111334
Child abducting dog rapists are uniornically LESS propagandized against then National Socialists are by a wide margin
Again, given that you RIGHTLY know the people who run society DO NOT have your best interests at heart
And given you also know they quote
>"Manufacture Consent"
Via media manipulation
You really SHOULD come to ask WHY they demonized said group over child abducting dog rapists and revolutionary communists (the latter of which by your logic should be the bigger threat compared to natsoc)
But given that you haven't already i DOUBT you will
tho who fucking knows anon
never to late to gain consiousness
>>

 No.111338

>>

 No.111339

>>111338
I come hard to these. Thanks fren
>>

 No.111340

File: 1627008048247.jpg ( 263.42 KB , 2000x2000 , intcallspoltranymeme (1).jpg )

>>111335
>Be lefty/faggot
>Go to 8kun
>Post black dicks while claiming to be "le ebil nazi!" OWO
>>>get to fap and mindlessly shill as programmed at the same fuckin time
sounds like a soy drinker's paradise.
>>

 No.111341

>>111337
>Anon call me when a single person finding out you hold the ideology you do will get you banned from ALL job entries and uneverities the nation over. Then come talk to me about how fucking "revolutionary" you are
Being revolutionary isn't an aesthetic you retard. You literally have the same logic as a radlib, but you just interpret what is "controversial" differently. How accepted the idea is or isn't is not what defines the substance of revolutionary politics.
>>

 No.111342

>>111337
David Graeber couldn’t get a job in the USA after his involvement in wall street and he wasn’t even marxist. Name any famous american marxist professors other than Richard Wolff. And this guy just argues for “muh co-ops.”
>>

 No.111343

File: 1627008318699.png ( Spoiler Image, 584.35 KB , 800x1008 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>111340
Man you’re just seething, ‘cause you will never have picrel happen to you.
>>

 No.111344

>>111340
>Yea man it’s leftypolers posting black dick in our board all day every single day
<Yup this much smaller imageboard is doing it, not us
<No True Polfaggot masturbates to BLACKED obviously
>>

 No.111345

File: 1627008782076.jpg ( 194.86 KB , 2949x1000 , Annotation 2020-02-26 1547….jpg )

>>111341
>How accepted the idea is or isn't is not what defines the substance of revolutionary politics.
Kinda literally fucking does anon
(As "Revolution" is by definition a CHANGE in socio-political norms which means a deviation from the current which again, by definition, inherently CANNOT be that which is alreayd accepting meaning that which is LESS accepted is definitionally MORE revolutionary)
>>111342
Anon name some famous american professors PERIOD.
Its literally just Rick Wolf, Noam Chomsky and Jordan Fucking Peterson.
The fact that two of the three oppose Markets and are ROUTINELY invited to speak at the wealtheist god damn univeritites in nation
SHOULD
TELL
YOU
SOMETHING
(as well should the fact that they are both jewish tell you something despite jews being 2% of the US population)
>>111343
>lefties posting gay uyghur porn
imagine my shock
>>111344
>Yea man it’s leftypolers posting black dick in our board all day every single day
you literally post it no your own dude
>>>111343
>>

 No.111346

>>111337
Anon, Marx is correct. You keep doing this process of indirect speculation and statements alleging something to exist intangibly, but none of it matters at the end of the day. Anons here are Marxists because Marx is correct, and even in a mad world that holds true. You can't emotionally cajole or cudgel us, our convictions remain the same. Whoever thinks Marx to be right, whatever people think of us in either a positive or negative fashion, it doesn't matter. It could be revealed today that all the elites were secret Marxists, and we would hold true to what we know to be correct. Marx stands tall regardless, his work living and immortal.

Also, natsoc are frequently used around the world to beat back communist revolutions. They're just the guard dog that's not let in the house, because more profitable means exist currently.
>>

 No.111347

>>111345
>(As "Revolution" is by definition a CHANGE in socio-political norms which means a deviation from the current which again, by definition, inherently CANNOT be that which is alreayd accepting meaning that which is LESS accepted is definitionally MORE revolutionary)
Anon, that's not what revolution means. Revolution politically denotes a change to the system itself, not necessarily of the ideas the masses have come to hold. If that was the case, no popular revolution would be revolutionary by merit of it being a popular revolution.
>>

 No.111348

>>111345
>Raping dogs is revolutionary
>Name 3 Famous Professors
What about Hans Hoppe and Ludwig von Mises? Friedrich Hayek? Charles Murray? Richard Lynn? Arthur Jensen?
>>

 No.111352

>>111340
>>111345
Explain this https://archive.is/qGVdV
>8kun
Literally no one uses fedkun bedsides those that purposefully want their posts screened by the government. If you admit to migrating to 8kun after 8chan fell, you're actually clinically retarded. Also, that image itself isn't from here, its also taken from right wing blacked fetish sites.
>>

 No.111355

File: 1627009796082.jpg ( 123.2 KB , 827x1130 , keeptheimmigrantsdeportthe….jpg )

>>111346
>M-m-MARX IS CORRECT BECAUSE CORRECT!!!
lol
anon we've been doing this long enough
you should know that shit isn't going to fucking sway me
And if you know that?
why post it???
I know why i do what i do
why do you?
>>111347
>If that was the case, no popular revolution would be revolutionary by merit of it being a popular revolution.
Only at the point it became popularion (and socially acceptable)
In a snese i do se some validity to your point though
i think the issue is the conflating of power dynamics number superiority
(which is broadly speaking an issue with left-wing thought often)
Majorities of Americans opposed both desergregation and gay marriage when they were rammed through from above
(feel free to "fact check" me on that btw)
Didnt make either any less a product of the status quo social "morality"
>>111348
Anon i only know who Hayek is because i went to college
only know hoppe because i was a larper at 14
And only know murray because i literally browse stormfront.
None of these fuckers are "famous" outside of Hayek who ISN'T even fucking American (which was your criteria) which if dropped allows me to bring up leftist intellectuals from Zizek to Marcuse, To horkhimer to Gromche all LEAPS and mother fucking BOUNDS more famous then Hoppe or mother fucking Richard Lynn.
>>111352
>explain a linked filled with the shit you were talking about bigot!!!
how??
>H-h-HE JUST HAD IT SAVED ON HIS HARD DRIVE!!!
lol.
>>

 No.111362

>>111356
Look up the title, god damn. It’s apparently from life magazine.
>>

 No.111363

>>111358
Tendency for the rate of profit to fall? The periodic crises of capitalism?
>>

 No.111369

>>111358
I am not a Marxist but here are three things that even I can admit Marx was right on:
>Constant Crisis under Capitalism
>Falling Rate of Profit
>Labour Theory of Value
Try to refute any of these three go. You can't because not only is it impossible, you can't even fall back on anything such as """"National Socialist""""" theory; I've seen your fucking /pol/ infographics on """what to read""" and you have libertardians like Mises and US University of Chicago morons like Thomas Sowell feeding basic bitch rightoid economic theory to you, that is, assuming you even bothered to read that crap which I highly doubt you even bothered with.
>>

 No.111370

File: 1627010478897-0.png ( 65.38 KB , 309x454 , 1_11.png )

File: 1627010478897-1.png ( 7.42 KB , 420x284 , FT_15.03.05_selma.png )

>>111355
>Majorities of Americans opposed both desergregation and gay marriage when they were rammed through from above
>(feel free to "fact check" me on that btw)
>>

 No.111373

>>111370
>negro voting rights=desergregation
>>>single poll on gay marriage
so legit.
>>

 No.111374

>>111355
>how??
Are you seriously implying that this board took the time to fabricate week long discussions on the interracial board on 8chan and crafted elaborate personas and arguments to provide a convincing guise of 8chan /pol/yps jacking off to black porn, during a time when we were too busy arguing amongst ourselves over shit regarding the mod team?

Because wew to that.
>>

 No.111375

>>111374
>Are you seriously implying that this board took the time to fabricate week long discussions on the interracial board on 8chan and crafted elaborate personas and arguments to provide a convincing guise of 8chan /pol/yps jacking off to black porn, during a time when we were too busy arguing amongst ourselves over shit regarding the mod team?

Anon i once created a parrody of the entire communist manifesto just to piss off a transhumanist on 8 chan
Yes,
you absolutely could have had annons commited enough to do EXACTLY that with the time commitment.
>>

 No.111376

File: 1627010997018.png ( 7.35 KB , 200x353 , FT_15.03.05_support.png )

>>111373
>negro voting rights=desergregation
The result is literally the same, and everyone knew it. Here's another. I suppose you have different data?
>single poll on gay marriage
Do you have a different one? The majority of the data for the year 2015 shows most people being fine with gay marriage when it passed in the states.
>>

 No.111382

>>111375
>Anon i once created a parrody of the entire communist manifesto just to piss off a transhumanist on 8 chan
By yourself anon, and that's literally nothing new. You're implying that /leftypol/ collaboratively (which is a word that has never been evoked for this board save for one occasion) worked together for nearly 6 months to specifically space out individual posts and craft individual narratives in order to create a single thread on a porn board, that most anons had no idea even existed before the screenshot circulated, in order to create a flaseflag of the less well know version of /pol/.

And you think we believe in tall tales.
>Yes, you absolutely could have had annons commited enough to do EXACTLY that with the time commitment.
Just to get this straight, every lazy obviously exaggerated caricature of a post that just so happens to align with /pol/'s every perception of the left = 100% legitimate
Every right wing post that features any person even vaguely on the far right doing anything which is embarrassing for you and having discussion that shows zero signs of being fabricated on a porn board on one of the most right wing imageboards at the time and whose user population was majority far-right = 100% fake
Some real "honesty" on display here, lol.
>>

 No.111384

File: 1627011730013.jpg ( 319.39 KB , 1500x1490 , Screenshot 2021-06-28 1023….jpg )

>>111376
>The result is literally the same, and everyone knew it. Here's another. I suppose you have different data?
The results of the 1968 presidentail election come to mind
>Do you have a different one? The majority of the data for the year 2015 shows most people being fine with gay marriage when it passed in the states.
Yes anon,
AFTER the states passed it
Thats how leftist indoctrination WORKS.
You normalize rape, murder, death, depression and degeneracy on a mass scale and then label all those who oppose their children literally being
FUCKING
RAPED
As
>"Bigots"
or
>"Sexists"
or
>"Racists"
Or whatever other brainless meaningless buzzword you can as suicide and drug addiction rates shoot up beyond any other point in world history.
I dont claim the majority of whites are
>"Secretly racist"
(aside from their own instincts which they are taught surprsess and FEEL bad for having)
On the contrary
You souless fucking fanatics have absolutely and succesfully terroized them to submission in the vast, VAST majority of cases.
The soulless i take is that liberalism as an ideology (again, BROAD liberalism) piosons itself.
You can look at differences in liberal vs "conservative" suicide, drug usage and fertility rates if you want proof of this.
The entire ideology bends towards literal shizophrenia and the opposition to all realities outside that of the ego including biological sex, race and the laws of phisics.
You already have pretty mainstream liberals cutting their fucking genitalia off and blowing their brains out after loveless homosexual and ployamerous relationships the TV told them to hold inevitable leads to their brain producing so much negative hormones in sheer despair at the absolute and objectively TERRIBLE decisions they have made that they put the barrel of a shot gun in their mouth and pull the fucking trigger.
On a broader scale you se this already happening with the socio-political and economic collapse of the west and most of western europe as society rips itself apart in an orgy of nihilism and self hatred devided between camps that either care so little about perserving their lives they want to risk as openly as possible infection from a deadly virus and those who want to allow in literal child fucking rapist immigrants in the name of
>"Tollerance"
and
>"Diversity"
The cold war itself was just another example of this on an evern larger scale
Liberalism is contradictory in practice the moment a democratic majority rejects the liberal "moral norms"
From that point on liberalism is forced to become anti-democratic by nature in order to perserve itself
and in that sense?
Liberalism ceases to exist (in so far as it is a doctrinally democratic ideology)
>>

 No.111385

File: 1627012188728.jpg ( 18.26 KB , 1280x720 , iwonderwhatwillhappennow.jpg )

>>111382
>You're implying that /leftypol/ collaboratively (which is a word that has never been evoked for this board save for one occasion)
do tell
>worked together for nearly 6 months to specifically space out individual posts and craft individual narratives in order to create a single thread on a porn board, that most anons had no idea even existed before the screenshot circulated, in order to create a flaseflag of the less well know version of /pol/.
or literally just one-two dudes with decent vpns
>Every right wing post that features any person even vaguely on the far right doing anything which is embarrassing for you and having discussion that shows zero signs of being fabricated on a porn board on one of the most right wing imageboards at the time and whose user population was majority far-right = 100% fake
Anon there plenty of embarasing shit i'd cop to the right doing
Gamergate to the teaparty take your fucking pic
You posted an obvoius fucking shill thread where leftists talked about black dicks just like they always fucking do on here
and always shill on /pol/
You are trying to claim your enemies do the thing that would definitionally them one of you despite the obvious contradiction
its fucking pathetic anon
And you cant honestly expect me to take it seriously
>>

 No.111387

Why is /pol/ bitching about us shitting all over their board? Do you have no self awareness?
>>

 No.111389

>ITS A BATTLE OF LIFE OR DEATH OUT THERE
>IF THE JEW CAN POST BBC ON OUR SEKRIT SITE THEN WE ARE SAFE NOWHERE
>RISE UP WHITE MEN AND JON STARY WHITE MEN AND TAKE BACK YOUR INTERNET ONE GORE POST AT A TIME
>>

 No.111391

File: 1627012512066.jpg ( 74.54 KB , 994x1024 , danearyassmoking (1) (1).jpg )

>>111389
YOUR GOD DAMN RIGHT MOTHER FUCKER!!!!
>>

 No.111392

>>111391
>the internet is srs business
underaged users ruined your site, not us
>>

 No.111394

File: 1627012738340.jpg ( 105.74 KB , 1000x914 , atleastmeme (1) (1).jpg )

>>111392
Anon i've seen enough gay and uyghur shill stuff on here to know thats a fuckin lie
(not that the site IS ruined mind you, just shilled because you fuckin pussies hate being shown up by a bunch of neckbeards with nothing better to do)
honestly the fact that there are white dudes who considers themselves leftists who AREN'T self identified faggots is one of the most sad satires in reality by far.
Simping endlessly for the untold masses who,
quite literlaly,
want your head on a fucking spear.
But hey anon?
At least the ni.gs dont know what private property is!!!
>>

 No.111396

>>111394
Anon, you're so comically retarded that I can't help but feel like you're some leftcom b8ing me into wasting my time.
>>

 No.111398

File: 1627013116077.jpg ( 144.18 KB , 1000x1298 , boardroommemebasic (1) (1).jpg )

>>111396
Nah just had a couple beers
It is the truth tho, albiet inelequently put.
They do want you fuckin dead dude
They dont give a shit about "class"
They WONT give a shit about class
And if your project every "succeded" on base level?
It would mean the death of you and most of the people you love at the hands of the brown masses you work to empower
That is what a "post-market" world looks like under Marxist Terms.
The only opposition to the market that doesnt result in that being strausserism
which we both fuckin know you aren't willing to take the redpill on
>>

 No.111401

>>111398
While you were being a degenerate I was reading Xi, will your ancestors smile upon you as mine will upon me?
Unlikely, swine.
>>

 No.111403

>>111401
My ancestors are smiling on me imperial
>>

 No.111406

File: 1627014638944.jpg ( 49.69 KB , 985x349 , Screenshot_20210722-232947….jpg )

>>111404
auto-fellatio is hot ngl
>>

 No.111411

>>111406
/b/ASED AND SI/b/ERIAN
>>

 No.111412

>>111384

Pure pathology. Why are right wingers so utterly enslaved by their own malfunctioning neurotransmitters?
>>

 No.111413

File: 1627015863239.gif ( 48.39 KB , 220x220 , kanna-kamui-maid-dragon.gif )

Gender is not real and the concept of women itself is as it is conservative and reactionary
>>

 No.111417

File: 1627016199129.jpeg ( 90.69 KB , 474x741 , based crossdressser.jpeg )

>>111413
Pretty much, yeah.
>>

 No.111418

>>111412
>enslaved by their own malfunctioning neurotransmitters
This is the final redpill
>>

 No.111422

>>111385
>do tell
No
>or literally just one-two dudes with decent vpns
For six months? C'mon, employ Occam's Razor once in your life, because this is where it actually applies.
>Anon there plenty of embarasing shit i'd cop to the right doing. Gamergate to the teaparty take your fucking pic.
You and I both know there's more shit then that.
>You posted an obvoius fucking shill thread where leftists talked about black dicks just like they always fucking do on here and always shill on /pol/
Proof? I'm only seeing one image here meant to mock you, and that's it.
>You are trying to claim your enemies do the thing that would definitionally them one of you despite the obvious contradiction
How would it "definitionally them one" of us? That doesn't make any sense. They even lay out why they're still in the clear in their eyes, which is that as long as its just fantasy or no actual interbreeding happens, its all ok. Technically, there is no contradiction here, nothing on the far right explicitly makes it against your shared racialist views. Maybe not your particular racialist views, but the general racialist view itself.
>its fucking pathetic anon. And you cant honestly expect me to take it seriously
You'd better learn to.
>>

 No.111442

I have a labor-related analysis of this phenomenon but I'm only going to post it if they really piss me off.
>>

 No.111658

>>111413
>Gender is not real
It is real, though.
Its realness and biological determinism are both overrated, which is why it's so inaccurate, but it does exist.
>>

 No.111682

>>111413
But all men have to be hyper-masculine godchads?
>>

 No.112245

>>111442
Getting there.
>>

 No.112269

>>111387
They know what they're doing, they know that they are doing it, they just pretend to lack self-awareness. Although the newest of /pol/ newfags probably are that stupid.

Anyway, just report this faggot and move on.
>>

 No.112507

>>111418
Anti-thinking anti-life gang?
>>

 No.116173

>>111002
>Why is the main concern of most right-wingers online people who inject themselves with hormones?
They are deluded into thinking that trans women want to deceive them.
Just like it's the fattest, ugliest feminists who shriek about straight male sexuality the most, it's the chinlessmost, weakest incels who shriek about trans women the most.
>>

 No.116210

>>111346
This is religion. A cult even.

Unique IPs: 39

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome